2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internationally adopted children: What vaccines should they receive?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
24
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
24
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our findings, other studies have reported lower levels of protection in Chinese children [11,15-17]. However, the results of previous studies compared to our study varied with respect to age [10,13,15,17], institutionalization [9,10,15,16], and nutritional status [10,13,15,16]. Given these differences, we felt it was important to adjust for these factors in multivariable analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to our findings, other studies have reported lower levels of protection in Chinese children [11,15-17]. However, the results of previous studies compared to our study varied with respect to age [10,13,15,17], institutionalization [9,10,15,16], and nutritional status [10,13,15,16]. Given these differences, we felt it was important to adjust for these factors in multivariable analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…While several studies have examined whether internationally adopted children have documentation of immunizations [5-8] and protective antibody levels to vaccine preventable diseases [9-19], only two studies have comprehensively examined factors associated with protection through multivariable analyses [15,16]. The results of these studies varied and the reasons for these differences are not entirely clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tetanus, they reported a lower proportion protected (87%) compared to ours (95%) which may be due to the different definitions of protection that were used (>0.50 IU/mL compared to ours >0.10 IU/mL). Similar to our data, two previous studies [11,12] detected an increase in protective antibody with additional number of doses for diphtheria and tetanus.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…For children with ≥3 doses of vaccine, we found the proportion protected in our study was slightly higher (77%) compared to Saiman (69%) [15]. Without regard to number of doses, our population had lower rates of protection (60%) compared to the children in the Cilleruelo study (76%) that took place during similar time periods as ours [11]. In the Verla-Tebit study, 94% of children with ≥2 doses of vaccine were protected [12].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation