2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International trade and emissions: The case of the Minas Gerais state — 2005

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
19
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, trade openness has little effect on the deforestation of Pakistan. Our results are consistent with the findings of Suri and Chapman, (1998a,b); Suri and Chapman, (1998a,b), Culas, 2007, DeFries et al, 2010, Carvalho et al, 2013and Ahmed, 2014 in terms of the effect of growth, energy, urbanization and trade effect on environmental degradation, respectively, and is inconsistent with Harbaugh et al, 2002;Copeland and Taylor, 2003;Peters et al, 2011;Ahmed andLong, 2012 andQazi et al, 2012, especially on the relationship of trade and environmental degradation. The statistically significant relationship (in the light of the EKC hypothesis) can be justified because Pakistan is still in the process of developing environmental standards for key sectors that contribute to growth at large, in addition to heavily relying on fossil fuel energy sources, which deplete environmental quality.…”
Section: Population Density (P)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, trade openness has little effect on the deforestation of Pakistan. Our results are consistent with the findings of Suri and Chapman, (1998a,b); Suri and Chapman, (1998a,b), Culas, 2007, DeFries et al, 2010, Carvalho et al, 2013and Ahmed, 2014 in terms of the effect of growth, energy, urbanization and trade effect on environmental degradation, respectively, and is inconsistent with Harbaugh et al, 2002;Copeland and Taylor, 2003;Peters et al, 2011;Ahmed andLong, 2012 andQazi et al, 2012, especially on the relationship of trade and environmental degradation. The statistically significant relationship (in the light of the EKC hypothesis) can be justified because Pakistan is still in the process of developing environmental standards for key sectors that contribute to growth at large, in addition to heavily relying on fossil fuel energy sources, which deplete environmental quality.…”
Section: Population Density (P)supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, it is expected that developing countries will emit 80% of global emissions in the near future (Huwart and Verdier, 2013). Carvalho et al, 2013;. Consequently, there is agreement regarding the need to encourage global energy measures that consider increasing the share of renewable sources in energy mix and the use of energy innovation to control environmental degradation (Arrow et al, 1996;Torras and Boyce, 1998;Andreoni and Levinson, 2001;Lorente and Álvarez-Herránz, 2016;Álvarez-Herránz et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The international literature presents many studies about the intensity of CO 2 or GHG emissions in economic sectors for different countries/regions from an environmental input-output framework. Studies by Carvalho et al (2013), Rhee and Chung (2006) and Su et al (2013), based on international trade's perspective, evaluated CO 2 emissions of Minas Gerais (Brazilian state), between Korea and Japan and China, respectively. Yamakawa and Peters (2011), Butnar and cadeia produtiva?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%