1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.1997.tb00424.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Technology and Operations Management: Resource Toolkit for Research and Teaching

Abstract: Increasing globalization has affected the way that firms are managed today. While its impact on competitive strategy, marketing, and finance has been well accepted and well studied, its effect on the firm's technology and operations has not. This paper provides resources for research and teaching in international technology and operations management (itom). Included are an extensive bibliography of papers and an overview of large‐scale survey research initiatives in the area. By bringing together and categoriz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If researchers are using a translation or adaptation approach in scale development and want to make comparisons between different groups or to pool data from different cultural groups, they should test and demonstrate measurement equivalence first, otherwise the comparison will not be meaningful. For example, Roth, Gray, Singhal, & Singhal (1997) and Roth (1996) used a translation approach to survey executives in 35 countries; however, great care was taken to ensure measurement equivalence of key constructs across countries in the pilot studies. A useful approach was taken by Voss, Roth, Rosenzweig, Blackmon, and Chase (2004), who used teams of cross‐trained interviewers from different countries to interview executives.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If researchers are using a translation or adaptation approach in scale development and want to make comparisons between different groups or to pool data from different cultural groups, they should test and demonstrate measurement equivalence first, otherwise the comparison will not be meaningful. For example, Roth, Gray, Singhal, & Singhal (1997) and Roth (1996) used a translation approach to survey executives in 35 countries; however, great care was taken to ensure measurement equivalence of key constructs across countries in the pilot studies. A useful approach was taken by Voss, Roth, Rosenzweig, Blackmon, and Chase (2004), who used teams of cross‐trained interviewers from different countries to interview executives.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We test our hypotheses using secondary data drawn from the Vision in Manufacturing Project (VIM), a research project jointly administered since 1989 by Deloitte Consulting and Professor Aleda Roth, now at Clemson University (Roth et al 1997). VIM aims to identify manufacturers' needs, to assess levels of operating capabilities and competitive strengths, and to benchmark factors deemed critical for competing effectively in the twenty first century.…”
Section: Research Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The database used in this research is part of a larger ongoing study, namely, the Vision in Manufacturing Project (VIM). VIM is an industry-academic research project that has been conducted biennially by Deloitte Consulting and researchers at the Kenan-Flagler Business School at the University of North Carolina since 1989 (see Roth, Gray, Singhal, and Singhal 1997 for details of the study). In addition to more traditional manufacturing strategy data, the 1997 survey used in this research gathered data on competitive capabilities and performance from manufacturing firms worldwide, and contained over 900 items with a mix of perceptual and objective data.…”
Section: Research Databasementioning
confidence: 99%