2017
DOI: 10.2175/193864717822153364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Stormwater BMP Database: New Tools for a Long-term Resource

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
14
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is strong support in both the International BMP Database , and our results that BMP type influences DIP removal performance. In the 2020 database summary, difference in median influent and effluent DIP concentrations was greatest for bioretention (leached 0.24 mg/L), followed by grass swales (0.07 mg/L), then grass strips (0.06 mg/L) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is strong support in both the International BMP Database , and our results that BMP type influences DIP removal performance. In the 2020 database summary, difference in median influent and effluent DIP concentrations was greatest for bioretention (leached 0.24 mg/L), followed by grass swales (0.07 mg/L), then grass strips (0.06 mg/L) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…There is strong support in both the International BMP Database , and our results that BMP type influences DIP removal performance. In the 2020 database summary, difference in median influent and effluent DIP concentrations was greatest for bioretention (leached 0.24 mg/L), followed by grass swales (0.07 mg/L), then grass strips (0.06 mg/L) . In our analysis, bioretention also leached the most on average (0.22 mg/L), although relative leaching from grass strips and swales was flipped compared to the Database report.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the lack or inadequacy of GSI performance data, especially those collected through on‐site monitoring, for a site‐specific climate and watershed, is highlighted in many studies (Cohen‐Shacham et al, 2019; Deely et al, 2020; Dhakal & Chevalier, 2017; Hamel & Tan, 2021; Kumar et al, 2020). This might be partially due to the fact that, even with all the significant progress in stormwater‐related performance monitoring manifested in commonly‐used databases, the extrapolation and generalization of a case study‐specific data to other projects or even larger spatial scales leads to uncertainty in performance assessment for GSI planning and performance estimation and even misconceptions about their features and functionality (Clary et al, 2020; Shafique & Kim, 2017; Ureta et al, 2021).…”
Section: Reviewed Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A suite of structural controls, called stormwater best management practices (BMPs), are available to Meter and Basu 2015; Pitt et al 2018). Similarly, factors that vary with region such as air temperature, BMP design, and inflow concentrations have been shown to regulate BMP performance (Barrett 2008;Rosenzweig et al 2011;Mallin et al 2012;Granato 2014;Koch et al 2014;Bell, Tague, et al 2017;Clary et al 2017;Mcphillips and Matsler 2018). Because these controls on performance vary with region, we hypothesize that BMP performance also varies regionally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%