International Relations and Security in the Digital Age

Eriksson, Johan; Giacomello, Giampiero

doi:10.4324/9780203964736

Cited by 26 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Proving John Perry Barlow (or Friedman) wrong was the easy part (Barlow 1996). The hard part involved documenting the political, economic, and social transformations that were taking place and the evidence continues to roll in (Dunn Cavelty, Mauer, and Krishna‐Hensel 2007; Eriksson and Giacomello 2007; Mueller, Kuerbis, and Page 2007). An equal deluge of scholarship conforms the status quo of state control (Goldsmith and Wu 2006), the triumph of great powers (Drezner 2007), resurgence of (long‐distance) nationalism and, to some extent, barriers to electronic commerce.…”

Section: What Is Being Controlled On the Internet?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Controls the Internet? Beyond the Obstinacy or Obsolescence of the State

Eriksson¹,

Giacomello²

2009

International Studies Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: What Is Being Controlled On the Internet?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Controls the Internet? Beyond the Obstinacy or Obsolescence of the State

Eriksson¹,

Giacomello²

2009

International Studies Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…On the other hand, the largest part of the production on Internet governance in the last two decades is either normative in nature -proposing that Internet governance skew power politics -or -when analytical -concerned with technical aspects related to the technology itself and to the societal outcomes produced by its popularization. The evaluation of the latter for international relations has only recently gotten more space in the agenda (ERIKSSON; GIACOMELLO, 2007;KARATZOGIANNI, 2009;DEIBERT ET AL, 2012;DEIBERT, 2013;DENARDIS, 2014;RAYMOND AND DENARDIS, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Brazilian Reactions to the Snowden Affairs: Implications for the Study of International Relations in an Interconnected World

Ferreira

Canabarro

2015

Conjuntura Austral/UFRGS-Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Apesar do papel central da Internet para a compreensão atual do ciberespaço, as agendas de governança da Internet e de cibersegurança apenas convergiram a partir das revelações de Edward Snowden sobre os programas de espionagem digital dos Estados Unidos. O Caso Snowden aumentou a entropia do complexo ecossistema da Internet, e reacendeu tensões a respeito da proeminência americana na administração dos recursos críticos da Rede. Nesse contexto, muitos países demonstraram preocupações sobre o futuro da governança da Internet, e o Brasil ganhou destaque no debate. Este artigo (a) resume as preocupações oriundas do Caso Snowden e seus impactos gerais sobre o ecossistema de governança da Internet; (b) analisa as medidas políticas tomadas pelo Brasil no campo em questão, antes e depois dos vazamentos de Snowden; e (c) detalha como o Brasil utilizou o Caso para promover sua agenda política para governança da Rede internacionalmente, fomentando a adoção de um complexo de governança mais pluralístico e democrático. Ao fim, o texto reflete sobre as possibilidades de mudança no ecossistema de governança global da Internet após o anúncio da intenção estadunidense de renunciar seus privilégios na supervisão do funcionamento de recursos críticos da Rede.

show abstract

“…Similarly, Conway (2002Conway ( , 2007 has published analyses of cyber terrorism, and on the ways in which extremist networks use the internet. As pointed out in Eriksson & Giacomello (2007), security in the digital age requires a close examination of terrorist networks in cyber space. The technology of the internet, particularly its interactivity, has enabled the sharing of information and user-generated content, so much so that it has generally been accepted as a space for national and transnational political activity (McNair, 2008;Hassan, 2008).…”

Section: The Internet As a Source Of Qualitative Data? Towards An Anamentioning

confidence: 99%

Performing terror, anti-terror, and public affect: Towards an analytical framework

Harindranath

2011

Continuum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This essay contends that there is a need for a new conceptual framework in order to analyse the interconnections between three different discourses on global and local terrorism: acts of terror; state mobilizations of anti-terror policy and rhetoric; and thirdly, public affect, which manifests expressions among others of insecurity, suspicion of religious and ethnic Others, and national allegiance. Often the interactions between these three domains enact the ways in which local extremist acts are refracted through global discourses on terror and anti-terror. This paper argues that Butler's notion of 'performativity' provides an analytical tool for the examination of these discourses, and that the internet offers the opportunity to analyse these three domains and the ways in which they interact with each other.

show abstract

International Relations and Security in the Digital Age

Cited by 26 publications

References 0 publications

Who Controls the Internet? Beyond the Obstinacy or Obsolescence of the State

Who Controls the Internet? Beyond the Obstinacy or Obsolescence of the State

The Brazilian Reactions to the Snowden Affairs: Implications for the Study of International Relations in an Interconnected World

Performing terror, anti-terror, and public affect: Towards an analytical framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About