2014
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2014.979247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International rankings and the contest for university hegemony

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
33
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the NSS could be understood as being agentially enfolded into larger-scale international apparatuses, such as international neoliberal policy practices, international HEI ranking industries (cf. Jöns & Hoyler, 2013;Ordorika & Lloyd, 2015) and bottom up streams of capital distribution (cf. Piketty, 2014) and resultant plutocratisation (Gates, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the NSS could be understood as being agentially enfolded into larger-scale international apparatuses, such as international neoliberal policy practices, international HEI ranking industries (cf. Jöns & Hoyler, 2013;Ordorika & Lloyd, 2015) and bottom up streams of capital distribution (cf. Piketty, 2014) and resultant plutocratisation (Gates, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…English-speaking countries pioneered this approach as a dominant mechanism to measure institutional performance for stakeholders and broader public evaluation. Although validity of ranking system derives from its objectivity based on international recognition of research publications by Thomson Reuters and Elsevier's Scopus databases it heavily reflects US model of higher education predomination and is biased towards English-language publications, [11]. Substantial research funds from government and other sources and English as the primary language for both education process and research considered as advantage in ranking placement, [2].…”
Section: Internationalization Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jak piszą Imanol Ordorika i Marion Lloyd, "przez ustanowienie wąskiego układu kryteriów, poprzez które wszystkie instytucje są mierzone, rankingi służyły wzmacnianiu hegemonii anglosaskiego, a w szczególności amerykańskiego modelu edukacji". W takim ujęciu partykularna koncepcja szkolnictwa wyż- szego, jaką jest elitarny badawczy uniwersytet amerykański, została narzucona całemu światu jako placówka "idealna" 15 . Inaczej mówiąc, to jego sposób funkcjonowania stał się uniwersalnym standardem.…”
unclassified