International norm polarization: sexuality as a subject of human rights protection

Abstract

International norm polarization is a rare but recurring process within international norm dynamics. Polarization describes the most combative response to attempted norm change: ‘a candidate norm is accepted by some states but resisted by others, leading to a period of international disputation between two groups in which socializing pressures pull states toward compliance with rival norms’. We identify several cases of polarization and explain this phenomenon by elaborating the constructivist model of the norm life cycle to processes of international resistance to norm change as well as to norm acceptance. We also draw on social identity theory (SIT) to examine group-psychological responses where disputed norms become closely linked to state identity. We illustrate these dynamics with reference to conflict over the norm that recognizes sexual orientation and gender identity as subjects of international human rights protection. Over the past decade this candidate norm has become increasingly contentious internationally, and bitter debates over resolutions concerning extra-judicial killings and discrimination have divided the United Nations General Assembly and Human Rights Council. The article makes a primary contribution to analysis of international norm change and also contributes to an emerging literature concerning sexuality and international relations.

Relationships between Religion and Two Forms of Homonegativity in Europe—A Multilevel Analysis of Effects of Believing, Belonging and Religious Practice

“…In Eastern Europe, on the other hand, where homonegative discourses are highly prevalent, propagated by political leaders and inscribed in the legislations of countries like Russia, Ukraine and Serbia religious believing has little statistical significance. Homonegativity in Eastern Europe is not driven by traditionalist religious beliefs, but is a widely socially accepted phenomenon, often seen as part of a nationalist resistance against values that are seen as foreign and imposed [ 76 ] by a “decadent West”. The results make clear that it is important not just to look at the individual level, but to contextualize the findings.…”

“…Puar [ 73 ] and Ammaturo [ 72 ] point out that such utilizations led to the construction of accepted versus not accepted gay and queer identities that are intersected with race—non-white gays being more disadvantaged than white EU-nationals. At the same time in Eastern European countries, such as Russia, Serbia, Ukraine, Lithuania and Latvia, homosexuals have been persecuted, and gay-rights taunted as expressions of a decadent Western ‘other’ by ultraconservative and religious nationalists [ 76 ]. The homonationalism literature has contributed important insights from an institutional meso-level perspective, but these theories are difficult to test with survey data.…”

How gains for SRHR in the UN have remained possible in a changing political climate

“…We also decided to omit an analysis on the resolutions on SOGI that took place within the HRC during the timeframe of our research (in 2014, 2016, and 2019), since considerable research has already examined these developments. [20][21][22]…”

The anticipatory politics of homophobia: explaining constitutional bans on same-sex marriage in post-communist Europe

“…Scholars are only just beginning to grapple with the fact that actors may also contest and reject liberal norms. In the international arena, such resistance may take the form of promoting rival norms (Symons and Altman 2015). Domestically, the resistance is preventative: lawmakers undertake steps to avoid unwanted norms from taking root in their societies.…”