2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11079-018-9483-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Investment Patterns: the Case of German Sectors

Abstract: In this paper we exploit the newly augmented Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey data of the IMF to study the cross-border inter-sectoral portfolio asset holdings of Germany. Our analysis reveals a significant degree of heterogeneity in the international asset positions of various German holding entities. The findings of our study also suggest differential relations between portfolio holdings and a set of "gravity-style" factors across holder-issuer pairings of various sectors. We conclude that aggregate-l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(), because these investors are the largest holdings of foreign bonds (see also Camanho, Hau, & Rey, ). Recent evidence by Galstyan and Velic (), who analyze foreign debt and equity holdings for different sectors from Germany, documents indeed mixed signs for the coefficient on distance when taking a more disaggregated sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(), because these investors are the largest holdings of foreign bonds (see also Camanho, Hau, & Rey, ). Recent evidence by Galstyan and Velic (), who analyze foreign debt and equity holdings for different sectors from Germany, documents indeed mixed signs for the coefficient on distance when taking a more disaggregated sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We build on a small number of papers that analyze international investment patterns without a representative investor (Giofré, 2013;Galstyan & Velic, 2018;Galstyan, Lane, Mehigan, & Mercado, 2016;Roque & Céu Cortez, 2014). These studies use disaggregated data from the CPIS to show how the determinants of bilateral asset holdings differ across investor sectors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we find that international positions co-vary with the level of macroeconomic and financial uncertainty. Resembling the general conclusions of Galstyan et al (2016) and Galstyan and Velic (2017), we identify heterogeneous patterns at a currency level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Adopting a gravity-style framework, this literature highlights the importance of bilateral ties and institutions in shaping cross-border distribution of international portfolio investments. More recent studies take a granular approach on portfolio holdings (Avdjiev et al, 2017;Galstyan et al, 2016;Galstyan and Velic, 2017). They show that the relationships present in aggregate data are not indicative of the underlying sectoral relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foreign portfolio of each sector is different and is summarized by one bundled sector-specific foreign asset denoted by f (i). It thus allows to capture the heterogeneity of returns on foreign asset portfolios across sectors highlighted by Galstyan and Velic (2018) for the case of Germany. Similarly, all other types of instruments that are not part of portfolio investments, such as loans, cash or real assets are bundled into a sector-specific outside asset noted o(i).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%