2018
DOI: 10.1080/07036337.2018.1553963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International institutions and domestic policy: assessing the influence of multilateral pressure on the European Union’s agricultural policy

Abstract: International institutions and domestic policy: assessing the influence of multilateral pressure on the European Union's Agricultural Policy There is a debate in international relations on how, when, and why international institutions influence domestic policy. This article contributes to this debate by looking at the influence of the World Trade Organization (WTO) on the European Union's (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). It shows that the transfer of authority to international institutions may transform … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, international pressure: the European market was the most protectionist in the world, leading to disputes with other large agricultural markets, such as the US, and to a lack of legitimacy towards the less developed world. During the Uruguay round, negotiations in the framework of GATT and WTO pushed the Europeans towards reforming the basic principles of their policy (Roederer-Rynning 2011; Daugbjerg 2017; Daugbjerg and Feindt 2017;Garcia-Duran et al 2018).…”
Section: The Cap's Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, international pressure: the European market was the most protectionist in the world, leading to disputes with other large agricultural markets, such as the US, and to a lack of legitimacy towards the less developed world. During the Uruguay round, negotiations in the framework of GATT and WTO pushed the Europeans towards reforming the basic principles of their policy (Roederer-Rynning 2011; Daugbjerg 2017; Daugbjerg and Feindt 2017;Garcia-Duran et al 2018).…”
Section: The Cap's Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%