2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)

Abstract: Summary.  New clinical, laboratory and experimental insights, since the 1999 publication of the Sapporo preliminary classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), had been addressed at a workshop in Sydney, Australia, before the Eleventh International Congress on antiphospholipid antibodies. In this document, we appraise the existing evidence on clinical and laboratory features of APS addressed during the forum. Based on this, we propose amendments to the Sapporo criteria. We also provide definit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

34
5,599
8
321

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,010 publications
(5,962 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
34
5,599
8
321
Order By: Relevance
“…All women had a routine RM work‐up to identify possible causes of the RM: a standardized history of the couple was performed, karyotyping of the couple (this was offered routinely before 2005 to all couples and after 2005 only in the presence of low maternal age and/or positive family history for RM),15 presence of uterine anomalies by ultrasound or hysteroscopy, and presence of acquired and heritable thrombophilia were assessed. For acquired thrombophilia, antiphospholipid syndrome was defined as the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies or lupus anticoagulant in repeated samples taken 3 months apart and at least 10 weeks after delivery;16 after revision of the classification criteria, the presence of anti‐β2 glycoprotein‐I was added to the work‐up 17. Hyperhomocysteinemia was evaluated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All women had a routine RM work‐up to identify possible causes of the RM: a standardized history of the couple was performed, karyotyping of the couple (this was offered routinely before 2005 to all couples and after 2005 only in the presence of low maternal age and/or positive family history for RM),15 presence of uterine anomalies by ultrasound or hysteroscopy, and presence of acquired and heritable thrombophilia were assessed. For acquired thrombophilia, antiphospholipid syndrome was defined as the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies or lupus anticoagulant in repeated samples taken 3 months apart and at least 10 weeks after delivery;16 after revision of the classification criteria, the presence of anti‐β2 glycoprotein‐I was added to the work‐up 17. Hyperhomocysteinemia was evaluated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Authors report observing no differences between the results of the two treatments, nor that aPL status predicted vascular occlusive events. There was a great deal of criticisms concerning the study design, and some comments are summarized in JAMA, June 2004 [27] by Cabral et al, Ruiz Irastorza et al, Wahl et al In summary, the mean age of patients was high, no confirmation tests were performed, only 0.2% patients had elevated aCL levels, and many patients were aPL positive (41%), leading to doubts concerning the specificity of the test, and the INR therapeutic target range was unusual and lower than the standard, most often recommended one [2] and [3]. More recently, the risk of ischaemic stroke and of myocardial infarction, has been shown to be very high in young women with lupus anticoagulant, in the RATIO study [28].…”
Section: Intervention Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Feinstein and Rapaport [1] used the term "lupus anticoagulant" for the first time in 1972, classification criteria for clinical and laboratory diagnosis have been proposed twice: i.e. Wilson et al [2], in 1999 (the so-called "Sapporo" criteria), and the current ones, in 2006, by Miyakis et al [3], (the "Sydney" criteria). These classification criteria have been formulated to allow a well-defined and shared picture of the syndrome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterized by the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLA) and clinical manifestations such as recurrent thromboembolic events and/or pregnancy complications [1]. APS may be concomitant with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), other autoimmune diseases, malignant diseases and bacterial or viral infections (secondary APS), but may also occur without an underlying disease (primary APS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%