2000
DOI: 10.2307/3236580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 3rd edition

Abstract: Abstract. This is the 3rd edition of the Code of phytosociological nomenclature, prepared by the Nomenclature Commission of the International Association for Vegetation Science (IAVS) and the Fédération Internationale de Phytosociologie (FIP) on the basis of the 2nd edition. The Code consists of a series of definitions, principles, rules and recommendations which will facilitate the proper use of syntaxonomical names for the denomination of syntaxonomical units.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
408
1
119

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 828 publications
(542 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
408
1
119
Order By: Relevance
“…Nomenclature of the syntaxa follows Zechmeister (1993) and Zechmeister & Mucina (1994) and is in accordance with the rules of the "Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature" (Weber et al 2000).…”
Section: Vegetation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nomenclature of the syntaxa follows Zechmeister (1993) and Zechmeister & Mucina (1994) and is in accordance with the rules of the "Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature" (Weber et al 2000).…”
Section: Vegetation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The description of the new association conforms to the international code of phytosociological nomenclature (Weber, Moravec and Theurillat 2000). Plant nomenclature follows Giardina, Raimondo and Spadaro (2007) and Raimondo, Domina and Spadaro (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to for the synecological descriptions, distribution, and diagnostic species lists for each association. The concepts and nomenclature of the classes and most of the follows Mucina et al (2016) and we applied the naming rules of the ICPN (Weber et al, 2000) to other high-rank syntaxa not covered by the European vegetation system (Mucina et al, 2016). In synonymy of some associations we also cite the article of the ICPN, according to which the synonym is deemed invalid or illegitimate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%