2003
DOI: 10.1080/08941920309166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Capital Versus Local Population: The Environmental Conflict of the Tambogrande Mining Project, Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
96
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
96
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is furthermore suggested that given the frequent geographic isolatedness of host communities, mining often represents the only viable option such communities have for socio-economic development. However mirroring earlier discussions there is a counter body of academic, NGO and activist literatures that draws upon the idea of a local level 'resource curse', and highlights the social, economic and environmentally deleterious impacts mining can have on communities (Manteaw, 2007;Muradian et al 2003;Newell, 2005). These impacts may take the form of pollution and environmental degradation as a result of mining activity, may manifest in conflict over land-use and the rights of indigenous groups, or may play out in the longer term in relation to life after mine closure and its economic, social and environmental legacies (Kemp, 2010;Kapelus, 2002;Hamann and Kapelus, 2004).…”
Section: Mining and Development: Blessing Or Curse?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is furthermore suggested that given the frequent geographic isolatedness of host communities, mining often represents the only viable option such communities have for socio-economic development. However mirroring earlier discussions there is a counter body of academic, NGO and activist literatures that draws upon the idea of a local level 'resource curse', and highlights the social, economic and environmentally deleterious impacts mining can have on communities (Manteaw, 2007;Muradian et al 2003;Newell, 2005). These impacts may take the form of pollution and environmental degradation as a result of mining activity, may manifest in conflict over land-use and the rights of indigenous groups, or may play out in the longer term in relation to life after mine closure and its economic, social and environmental legacies (Kemp, 2010;Kapelus, 2002;Hamann and Kapelus, 2004).…”
Section: Mining and Development: Blessing Or Curse?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information refers to all information relevant to the decision to permit a mine or evaluate regulatory compliance, including reports on mining impacts and baseline studies, such as those contained in an environmental impact assessment (EIA), for example. These decision making mechanisms vary from purely legal (i.e., the mining company meets the regulatory requirements) to those that take cognizance of the SLO and seek legitimacy [91]. In most recent cases, the information is provided by the mining company and/or government.…”
Section: Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to understand the local community after a massive demonstration and violent conflict, Muradian et al [91] uses gender, level of education, age and job field as important background characteristics. Other research indicates job field may be a useful factor [93].…”
Section: Community Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…water) distributions, or the allocation of risks and hazards (Muradian, Martinez-Alier, & Correa, 2003), cannot be solved in a manner that is agreeable to all parties involved (Edmunds & Wollenberg, 2001). Such conflicts are symptoms of inadequate or ineffective political processes, as much as they signal problems of a more technical nature.…”
Section: Water Governance and Socio-environmental Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This brings us to the second source of theoretical inspiration for this article, the literature on the entanglements between science and society. Because water is always contested, water (management and governance) questions cannot be resolved by just referring to 'objective', scientific information or analyses, but also involve matters of opinion and choice (Zwarteveen & Boelens, 2014) and have to do with interests and values (Muradian et al, 2003). Thus, to intervene in water conflict situations, scientific accounts of reality cannot be dealt with as an objective 'black box' separated from the context and from the political and social issues they are immersed in.…”
Section: Water Governance and Socio-environmental Conflictsmentioning
confidence: 99%