2002
DOI: 10.1207/s15327671espr0704_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Teacher Turnover in Urban Middle School Reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, variables such as the state of the economy, the nature and characteristics of the job, wage structure, demographic characteristics of individual in the environment unrealistic expectation, poor candidate screening, compensation issues job-scope, work tools and job security were identified as potential causes of labour turnover (Williams etal, 1994, Jackson, 1981and Stear, 1991. These identified causes according to Banjoko (2000) can be classified into two namely pull and push factor and Ruby (2002) added another dimension to it by adding internal and external. The pull factors are those variables that are outside the organisation attracting employees to leave their present jobs while the push factors are the variables within the organisation propelling employees to leave their job.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, variables such as the state of the economy, the nature and characteristics of the job, wage structure, demographic characteristics of individual in the environment unrealistic expectation, poor candidate screening, compensation issues job-scope, work tools and job security were identified as potential causes of labour turnover (Williams etal, 1994, Jackson, 1981and Stear, 1991. These identified causes according to Banjoko (2000) can be classified into two namely pull and push factor and Ruby (2002) added another dimension to it by adding internal and external. The pull factors are those variables that are outside the organisation attracting employees to leave their present jobs while the push factors are the variables within the organisation propelling employees to leave their job.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In attempting to make sense of this finding, we searched for studies that would help us to explain in more theoretically precise ways why high rates of leadership and teacher turnover might impede organizational functioning. We first searched the literature on school reform, and while we found a number of studies that asserted that there was a negative connection between turnover and organizational functioning (see e.g., Allensworth, Ponisciak, & Mazzeo, 2009; Fink & Brayman, 2006; Hargreaves & Fink, 2000; Partlow, 2007; Ruby, 2002), we found few that have investigated these relationships directly. We also searched the literature on teacher and leadership turnover, and while we found some studies linking turnover to indicators of poor organizational performance (i.e., low morale and poor working conditions) (see e.g., Allensworth et al, 2009; Fink & Brayman, 2006; Ingersoll, 2001; Loeb, Darling-Hammond, & Luczak, 2005; Loeb, Kalogrides, & Horng, 2010), we found few studies that investigated whether or how turnover may shape organizational response to external policy pressures.…”
Section: School Reform Social Context and Organizational Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The continued lack of teacher preparation contributed to variation in curriculum as teachers taught what they knew. It also contributed to a high rate of teacher turnover not only as science teachers left the school but also as they stayed but switched from teaching science to subjects they felt more prepared to teach (Ruby, 2002). Such turnover impeded the creation of a single curriculum, with all teachers prepared to teach it.…”
Section: Obstacles To Improving Science Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%