2017
DOI: 10.1111/grow.12222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Migration in Mexico: Consolidation of Urban–Urban Mobility, 2000–2015

Abstract: Internal migration has been recognized as the major influence in terms of population redistribution across urban systems, but it is not a homogeneous phenomenon. Within the context of internal rural‐urban migration decline and the negative changes in migratory balances in the metropolitan area of Mexico City, the core of enquiry in this paper is the approach to growth and consolidation of an internal urban–urban migration system in the early twenty‐first century (2000–2015). This process has taken place throug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a more refined understanding of migration between sectors, considering intraurban flows, in particular, may be significant. Intraurban flows constitute a considerable proportion of internal migration flows (Cattaneo and Robinson 2020; Pérez‐Campuzano, Castillo Ramírez, and Galindo Pérez 2018; Montgomery et al. 2003), and although such flows would not contribute to urbanization, they may explain individual city growth or highlight the role of secondary towns in the urbanization process (Christiaensen, Weerdt, and Todo 2013; Jedwab, Christiaensen, and Gindelsky 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a more refined understanding of migration between sectors, considering intraurban flows, in particular, may be significant. Intraurban flows constitute a considerable proportion of internal migration flows (Cattaneo and Robinson 2020; Pérez‐Campuzano, Castillo Ramírez, and Galindo Pérez 2018; Montgomery et al. 2003), and although such flows would not contribute to urbanization, they may explain individual city growth or highlight the role of secondary towns in the urbanization process (Christiaensen, Weerdt, and Todo 2013; Jedwab, Christiaensen, and Gindelsky 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is evidence that large numbers of migrants have eventually returned to Mexico and thus we do not expect international migration to significantly affect the distribution of ancestry in the medium run (Pew Research Center, 2015). The previous considerations only apply to country‐level ancestry estimates, as internal migration in Mexico increased after the year 2000 to an approximate 3.3% of the population in 2015 (Pérez‐Campuzano, Castillo Ramírez, & Galindo Pérez, 2018). Therefore, the state‐level ancestry distribution today might slightly differ from that of 20 years ago.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one, low-income households have little access to loans, according to the Group of Economists and Associates (GEA). The problem is further amplified by high rural–urban migration coupled with lower income jobs (Pérez-Campuzano et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%