2013
DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2012.708135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal and external factors in innovation persistence

Abstract: This paper contributes the analysis of the persistence of innovation activities, as measured by total factor productivity (TFP), and explores its internal and external determinants stressing its path-dependent characteristics. The external conditions, namely the quality of local knowledge pools and the strength of the Schumpeterian rivalry, along with the internal conditions (the actual levels of dynamic capabilities, as proxied by wage levels and firm size) exert a specific and localised effect upon the persi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
60
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(45 reference statements)
6
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This research supports the assumption that all firms in a local milieu such as a cluster or an agglomeration may not benefit from access to a high concentration of specialized, supplemented or varied knowledge diffused through voluntary (mostly pecuniary) and involuntary mechanisms. Contributors to this literature include Feldman (2003), Conte and Vivarelli (2005), Cassiman and Veugelers (2006b), Love andRoper (2009), Antonelli, Crespi, andScellato (2013), Lööf and Johansson (2014), and Antonelli and David (2015). For an additional contribution and a survey of the field of research, see Antonelli and Colombelli (2015).…”
Section: A Brief Background From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research supports the assumption that all firms in a local milieu such as a cluster or an agglomeration may not benefit from access to a high concentration of specialized, supplemented or varied knowledge diffused through voluntary (mostly pecuniary) and involuntary mechanisms. Contributors to this literature include Feldman (2003), Conte and Vivarelli (2005), Cassiman and Veugelers (2006b), Love andRoper (2009), Antonelli, Crespi, andScellato (2013), Lööf and Johansson (2014), and Antonelli and David (2015). For an additional contribution and a survey of the field of research, see Antonelli and Colombelli (2015).…”
Section: A Brief Background From the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed by (Antonelli et al, 2013), inventions and scientific breakthroughs have the capability of making some portions of the stock of knowledge or technologies obsolete. It involves studying the relationship between complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers.…”
Section: Inventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context of analysis, the presence of persistent patterns of above average productivity growth at the firm level can be interpreted as the result of the capability of firms to exploit dynamic capabilities to sustain competitive advantages as highlighted by management studies (Teece and Pisano, 1994;Verona and Ravasi, 2003;Teece, 2007;Vergne and Durand, 2011). In particular, building on recent developments in the economics of innovation that have paid attention to the analysis of innovation persistence (Malerba et al, 1997;Cefis, 2003;Peters, 2008;Roper and Dundas, 2008;Antonelli et al, 2012Antonelli et al, , 2013, it can be claimed that the repeated interactions between the accumulation of knowledge and the creation of routines to valorize and exploit it within the same organization may lead to the creation of dynamic capabilities that favour the systematic realization of above average productivity performances (Nelson and Winter 1982;Rothaermel and Hess 2007;Verona and Ravasi, 2003). This framework emphasizes that the past has a significant impact on current and future performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the role of knowledge cumulativeness and the relevance of strategic decisions to leverage internal and external knowledge is considered to be crucial in shaping pathdependent dynamics of productivity growth (Antonelli et al, 2013;Crespi and Scellato, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%