Intermodal transportation within the green supply chain: an approach based on ELECTRE method

Evaluating the technical barriers of large scale sustainable wireless sensor network: A resources approach

“…Li et al, 2014;M. Li et al, 2014;Haq and Boddu, 2015;Tyagi et al, 2015;Nigam, 2014;Patil and Kant, 2014;Jindal and Sangwan, 2013;Datta et al, 2013;Ahmadi and Kantaradjian, 2012;Boufateh et al, 2011;Sawadogo and Anciaux, 2011;Singh et al, 2010). Among MCDM, as discussed in earlier section, AHP is one of the most effective and accurate result provider was first proposed by Saaty (1980).…”

Action Mechanism and Model of Cross-Border E-Commerce Green Supply Chain Based on Customer Behavior

“…e analysis results show that the service innovation of import cross-border e-commerce platform needs to consider both internal and external factors. e internal factors include the staff's culture and quality, platform's own network technology level, and so on, and the external factors include the change of consumer demand brought by social progress [36]. e comprehensive score of service innovation ability of each import cross-border e-commerce platform is shown in Figure 3.…”

Corporate Profile, Performance and Green Supply Chain Management: A Research Agenda

“…The environmental performance of an organization includes the results obtained with the management of its environmental aspects, measured by indicators such as compliance with legal and customer requirements and costs associated with environmental compliance (ABNT, 2004(ABNT, , 2005Chan, He, Chan, & Wang, 2012;Olugu, Wong, & Shaharoun, 2011;Sawadogo & Anciaux, 2011).…”

“…Thirty-two models/frameworks which emphasized environmental performance have been identified: the companies which adopted GSCM reduced emissions of pollutants, use of waste water, solid waste and frequency of environmental accidents (Büyüközkan & Çifçi, 2012;Chan et al, 2012b;Chien & Shih, 2007;Chiou et al, 2011;Felice et al, 2012;Golghate & Pawar, 2012;Jamshidi et al, 2012;Koh et al, 2012;Lin, 2013;Mitra & Datta, 2014;Olugu et al, 2011;Sawadogo & Anciaux, 2011;Sheu et al, 2005;Singh et al, 2008;Zhao et al, 2012) and improvement operating activities (Chan et al, 2012a;Chiou et al, 2011;Dey & Cheffi, 2012;Dou et al, 2014;Felice et al, 2012;Felice et al, 2013;Giovanni & Vinzi, 2012;Golghate & Pawar, 2012;Green et al, 2012a;Green et al, 2012b;Kuo et al, 2014;Lee, 2008;Lee & Klassen, 2008;Olugu et al, 2011;Prata et al, 2013;Rao & Holt, 2005;Sheu et al, 2005;Shi et al, 2012;Tang et al, 2012;Wu, 2013;Zhu, Sarkis & Lai, 2012;Zhu et al, 2013).…”

“…Twenty models/frameworks have been found that address economic performance, in which positive and negative results were considered; that is, positive if the company, when participating in GSCM, reduced the cost of energy and water consumption (Sawadogo & Anciaux, 2011), decreased the rate of waste treatment and rate of waste discharge, increased reuse and recycling, decreased disposal of products and packaging (Hernandez et al, 2012;Jamshidi et al, 2012) and improved the profit margin (Bjourklund et al, 2012;Chan et al, 2012a;Chien & Shih, 2007;Green et al, 2012a;Mirhedayatian et al, 2014;Mirzapour Al-e-hashem & Rekik, 2013;Mitra & Datta, 2014;Paksoy et al, 2011;Pimenta et al, 2012;Prata et al, 2013;Salam, 2011;Sheu et al, 2005;Tsai & Hung, 2009). However, in relation to negative economic performance, the company increased investments to manufacture and market environmentally friendly products (Lin, 2013), operating costs increased (Olugu et al, 2011), cost of employee training increased to properly manage GSCM, costs rose due to the purchase of environmentally friendly materials, and spending on environmental awareness of customers, suppliers and society increased (Giovanni & Vinzi, 2012;Rao & Holt, 2005).…”