1993
DOI: 10.1080/0065955x.1993.11981980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent Exotropia: How Do They “Turn Out”?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The cause of this high rate of undercorrection is still not clear. Pritchard 2 once mentioned variability in the measurement of exotropia and pointed out that the most simple and obvious potential explanation for this high rate of recurrence of intermittent exotropia may be not operating to the full angle of the deviation. Kushner 3 suggested that patients who had 'outdoor sensitivity' or 'vergence aftereffect at distance' in the outdoor measurement through the window or postocclusion measurement at 6 meters should undergo surgery for the largest angle measured, because undercorrections typically exceed overcorrections in exotropia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The cause of this high rate of undercorrection is still not clear. Pritchard 2 once mentioned variability in the measurement of exotropia and pointed out that the most simple and obvious potential explanation for this high rate of recurrence of intermittent exotropia may be not operating to the full angle of the deviation. Kushner 3 suggested that patients who had 'outdoor sensitivity' or 'vergence aftereffect at distance' in the outdoor measurement through the window or postocclusion measurement at 6 meters should undergo surgery for the largest angle measured, because undercorrections typically exceed overcorrections in exotropia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postoperative results for IXT can sometimes be discouraging for patients due to the high rate of recurrence over time [ 16 ]. Pritchard attributed this finding to variability in the measurement of exotropia and, consequently, not operating to the full angle of deviation [ 17 ]. Thus, the current trend is to target the largest angle for optimal surgical results [ 9 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different surgical dosages are used for same amount of deviation which can potentially explain the wide variability of the outcomes reported in literature, however, no such relation was found in a study by Chia et al 22. Another potential cause for inconsistent surgical outcomes could be not operating for the maximum angle of deviation 91. Suggestions have been made to consider largest measured angle as the target angle for surgery for good outcomes, not necessarily the measurement of X(T) with a distant outdoor fixation target,92 without an increase in overcorrection.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Surgical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%