2009
DOI: 10.1080/01635580802419798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent Calorie Restriction Delays Prostate Tumor Detection and Increases Survival Time in TRAMP Mice

Abstract: Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in men. Whereas chronic calorie restriction (CCR) delays prostate tumorigenesis in some rodent models, the impact of intermittent caloric restriction (ICR) has not been determined. Here, transgenic adenocarcinoma of the mouse prostate (TRAMP) mice were used to compare how ICR and CCR affected prostate cancer development. TRAMP mice were assigned to ad libitum (AL), ICR (2 wk 50% AL consumption followed by 2 wk pair feeding to AL consumption), and CCR (25%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
63
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Food intake was not significantly different between groups (Table 3). Average food intake was similar to other studies of TRAMP mice consuming pelleted diets [20] [21], but 50% less than powdered diets fed by Zuniga et al [3]. Body weights were not significantly different between groups.…”
Section: Weight Gain and Feed Intakesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Food intake was not significantly different between groups (Table 3). Average food intake was similar to other studies of TRAMP mice consuming pelleted diets [20] [21], but 50% less than powdered diets fed by Zuniga et al [3]. Body weights were not significantly different between groups.…”
Section: Weight Gain and Feed Intakesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Contrary to this dogma, many studies suggest that a 20-40% reduction in calorie intake protects the host against toxins and retards the growth of tumors (Moreschi, 1909;Tannenbaum, 1945;Hursting et al, 1994Hursting et al, , 2001Hursting et al, , 2003Fontana et al, 2001Fontana et al, , 2006Harper et al, 2006;Bonorden et al, 2009;Colman et al, 2009;Longo and Fontana, 2010). However, this has never been translated into clinical applications because the effects are limited, as reduced calorie intake unavoidably causes weight loss, and because it was not clear that DR could not also protect cancer cells from chemotherapy.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the problems associated with the translation of DR into clinical applications is that chronic DR delays but does not stop the progression of the disease (Mukherjee et al, 2004;Bonorden et al, 2009;Shelton et al, 2010), and that this delay will occur for only a subset of malignancies (Kalaany and Sabatini, 2009). Although weight loss and cachexia in the early stages of cancer progression are not as common as thought (Tisdale, 2002;Fearon et al, 2003;Fox et al, 2009), the B15% loss of body mass index caused by a moderate (20%) calorie restriction (Racette et al, 2006) would prevent its use in the great majority of cancer treatment scenarios.…”
Section: Dr and Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mice, IF administered as 30%-50% CR over periods of 2-3 weeks followed by ad libitum feeding for an equal amount of time has been shown to be protective against tumor formation in models for both prostate cancer and breast cancer (125,126). In humans, IF has been shown to be both attainable and beneficial to health (127,128).…”
Section: Dietary Restriction Alternatives To Crmentioning
confidence: 99%