Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well-being

Abstract: This review is published as a Cochrane Review in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, 2. Cochrane Reviews are regularly updated as new evidence emerges and in response to comments and criticisms, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews should be consulted for the most recent version of the Review.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were also included. Then, the SEN and SPE were determined using a bivariate summary ROC (SROC) curve [26], and the AUC and 95% CIs were calculated [27]. We thus obtained the pooled sensitivity, specificity and the summary AUC of each miRNA and its frequency in all included profiles.…”
Section: Diagnostic Value Assessment For Mirnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were also included. Then, the SEN and SPE were determined using a bivariate summary ROC (SROC) curve [26], and the AUC and 95% CIs were calculated [27]. We thus obtained the pooled sensitivity, specificity and the summary AUC of each miRNA and its frequency in all included profiles.…”
Section: Diagnostic Value Assessment For Mirnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devane et al 2017 compared the effects of admission CTG with intermittent auscultation of the FHR on maternal and infant outcomes for pregnant women without risk factors on their admission to the labour ward. 12 They reviewed four trials involving more than 13,000 women. Although not statistically significant using a strict P < 0.05 criterion, data are consistent with women allocated to admission CTG having on average a higher probability of an increase in incidence of caesarean section than women allocated to intermittent auscultation (Risk ratio (RR) 1.20.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,9,10 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists states that either IA or continuous EFM is acceptable for the woman without complications. 5 While a systematic review of IA for labor surveillance is in the protocol stage, 11 neither the criteria that define low risk nor the methodology for conducting IA has been universally developed or accepted. 4,12,13 During IA, the fetal heart rate is auscultated between contractions to establish the baseline rate.…”
Section: Intermittent Auscultationmentioning
confidence: 99%