2017
DOI: 10.1097/mat.0000000000000512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent Aortic Valve Opening and Risk of Thrombosis in Ventricular Assist Device Patients

Abstract: This study evaluates quantitatively the impact that intermittent Aortic Valve opening has on the thrombogenicity in the aortic arch region for patients under Left Ventricular Assist Device therapy. The influence of flow through the Aortic Valve, opening once every five cardiac cycles, on the flow patterns in the ascending aortic is measured in a patient-derived CT-image-based model, after LVAD implantation. The mechanical environment of flowing platelets is investigated, by statistical treatment of outliers in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the pulsatility within the protruding inflow cannula was greatly increased, the high pulsatility within the cannula is not associated with greater forward flow, and thus produces additional shear that contributes to the thrombogenic potential. In addition, the presence of the protruding inflow cannula reduced the flow pulsatility at the left ventricular outflow tract, a region already vulnerable during LVAD support due to the decreased aortic valve opening …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the pulsatility within the protruding inflow cannula was greatly increased, the high pulsatility within the cannula is not associated with greater forward flow, and thus produces additional shear that contributes to the thrombogenic potential. In addition, the presence of the protruding inflow cannula reduced the flow pulsatility at the left ventricular outflow tract, a region already vulnerable during LVAD support due to the decreased aortic valve opening …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the presence of the protruding inflow cannula reduced the flow pulsatility at the left ventricular outflow tract, a region already vulnerable during LVAD support due to the decreased aortic valve opening. [36][37][38] While the dilated, low cardiac output condition serves as the baseline for our study, dilated cardiomyopathy has itself been associated with a 1%-2% stroke rate and 10% intraventricular thrombus incidence. [39][40][41] The risk of thromboembolism in cardiomyopathy is increased both with larger LV size and lower ejection fraction, both of which affect the fluid dynamics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent low velocities further substantiate the connection between no aortic valve opening and prevalence of thromboembolic events, 8,13,36,37,46 which was also demonstrated in other experimental and simulation studies. 33,43,45,52 To prevent thrombus formation in these regions, LVAD research has focused on periodic or synchronous pump speed changes 21,29,32,52,55 to promote aortic valve opening and minimize potential stagnation areas within the ventricle and the pump. 21,29,32,55 However, the required amplitude, frequency, and clinical applicability of these speed changes to ensure proper washout in the LVOT remains unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control of pumping states, in particular the aortic valve state, allows for avoidance of adverse events of RBPs in the cardiovascular system. This capability will also improve the prevention of long-term complications such as aortic valve insufficiency or thrombus formation [30, 31]. The periodic alternation between open and closed conditions will allow gradual training of heart muscle and thus reduce the risk of aortic atrophy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%