2007
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v12-407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittency on catalysts: symmetric exclusion

Abstract: 53 pagesInternational audienceWe continue our study of intermittency for the parabolic Anderson equation $\partial u/\partial t = \kappa\Delta u + \xi u$, where $u\colon \Z^d\times [0,\infty)\to\R$, $\kappa$ is the diffusion constant, $\Delta$ is the discrete Laplacian, and $\xi\colon \Z^d\times [0,\infty)\to\R$ is a space-time random medium. The solution of the equation describes the evolution of a ``reactant'' $u$ under the influence of a ``catalyst'' $\xi$. In this paper we focus on the case where $\xi$ is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer the reader to Gärtner, den Hollander and Maillard [15] for an overview. It was shown in Gärtner and den Hollander [13], and Gärtner, den Hollander and Maillard [14], [16], [17] that for ISRW, SEP and SVM in equilibrium the function κ → λ p (κ) satisfies:…”
Section: Interacting Particle Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to Gärtner, den Hollander and Maillard [15] for an overview. It was shown in Gärtner and den Hollander [13], and Gärtner, den Hollander and Maillard [14], [16], [17] that for ISRW, SEP and SVM in equilibrium the function κ → λ p (κ) satisfies:…”
Section: Interacting Particle Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the techniques we use for the three models differ substantially, there is a universal principle behind their scaling behavior. See the heuristic explanation offered in [6] and [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, in d D 3, the asymptotics of Ä p .Ä/ show a remarkable connection with the polaron model, whose meanfield version we briefly mentioned in Example 7.11; there is a heuristics for deeper reasons behind it. Þ Example 8.5 (Symmetric exclusion process) Let us describe the results of [GärHolMai07] and [GärHolMai09a] for the model (ii). Þ Remark 8.4 (Survival and extinction of branching random walks with catalysts) The interpretation of interacting reactants and catalysts in the model (i) above has also been studied in [KesSid03] with the additional assumption that reactant particles die at a certain deterministic rate ı 2 .0; 1/.…”
Section: Example 82 (Finitely Many Catalysts)mentioning
confidence: 99%