2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23811-6_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quenched Lyapunov Exponent for the Parabolic Anderson Model in a Dynamic Random Environment

Abstract: We continue our study of the parabolic Anderson equation ∂ u/∂t = κ∆ u + γξ u for the space-time field u :is the diffusion constant, ∆ is the discrete Laplacian, γ ∈ (0, ∞) is the coupling constant, and ξ : Z d × [0, ∞) → R is a space-time random environment that drives the equation. The solution of this equation describes the evolution of a "reactant" u under the influence of a "catalyst" ξ , both living on Z d .In earlier work we considered three choices for ξ : independent simple random walks, the symmetric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 t log u(0, t). It was shown in Gärtner, den Hollander and Maillard [8] that this exponent exists and is constant ξ-a.s., satisfies λ 0 (0) = E(ξ(0, 0)) and λ 0 (κ) > E(ξ(0, 0)) for κ ∈ (0, ∞), and is such that κ → λ 0 (κ) is globally Lipschitz on (0, ∞) outside any neighborhood of 0 where it is finite. Under certain weak space-time mixing assumptions on ξ, we show the following properties: (1) λ 0 (κ) does not depend on the initial condition u 0 ; (2) λ 0 (κ) < ∞ for all κ ∈ [0, ∞); (3) κ → λ 0 (κ) is continuous on [0, ∞) but not Lipschitz at 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…1 t log u(0, t). It was shown in Gärtner, den Hollander and Maillard [8] that this exponent exists and is constant ξ-a.s., satisfies λ 0 (0) = E(ξ(0, 0)) and λ 0 (κ) > E(ξ(0, 0)) for κ ∈ (0, ∞), and is such that κ → λ 0 (κ) is globally Lipschitz on (0, ∞) outside any neighborhood of 0 where it is finite. Under certain weak space-time mixing assumptions on ξ, we show the following properties: (1) λ 0 (κ) does not depend on the initial condition u 0 ; (2) λ 0 (κ) < ∞ for all κ ∈ [0, ∞); (3) κ → λ 0 (κ) is continuous on [0, ∞) but not Lipschitz at 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…(1. 8) In [6] we showed that λ 0 (0) = E(ξ(0, 0)) and λ 0 (κ) > E(ξ(0, 0)) for κ ∈ (0, ∞) as soon as the limit in (1.8) exists. In [3] we proved the following:…”
Section: Parabolic Anderson Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(1. 6) The formal solution of (1.1) is given by the Feynman-Kac formula u(x, t) = E x exp t 0 ξ(X κ (s), t − s) ds u 0 (X κ (t)) , (1. 7) where X κ = (X κ (t)) t≥0 is the continuous-time simple random walk jumping at rate 2dκ (i.e., the Markov process with generator κ∆), and P x is the law of X κ when X κ (0) = x.…”
Section: Parabolic Anderson Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1.10) and define the sets E l = {η ∈ : η l < ∞} and L l = {f : 11) and η x,y is defined by where, for a configuration η, c(x, η) is the rate for the spin at x to flip, and…”
Section: Choices Of Dynamic Random Environments (I) Space-time White mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further note that, by Jensen's inequality, 11) where the interchange of the expectations is justified because…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 13mentioning
confidence: 99%