2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-019-0427-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate-sized molecular sieving of styrene from larger and smaller analogues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) or porous coordination polymers have emerged as promising adsorbents for gas separation and purification owing to their powerful predictability and tunability on pore size/shape and functionality. [ 7–9 ] Since C 2 H 2 (kinetic diameter: 3.3 Å) has a relatively large size or polarity difference with C 2 H 4 (4.2 Å) and CH 4 (3.8 Å), highly efficient separation of C 2 H 2 /C 2 H 4 or C 2 H 2 /CH 4 has been fulfilled in some reported MOFs with benchmark selectivities by pore tuning and pore functionalization strategies. [ 10,11 ] However, compared with the separation of C 2 H 2 /C 2 H 4 and C 2 H 2 /CH 4 , C 2 H 2 /CO 2 separation is much more difficult and challenging because of their very close molecular size/shape (3.3 Å for both C 2 H 2 and CO 2 ) and physical properties.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) or porous coordination polymers have emerged as promising adsorbents for gas separation and purification owing to their powerful predictability and tunability on pore size/shape and functionality. [ 7–9 ] Since C 2 H 2 (kinetic diameter: 3.3 Å) has a relatively large size or polarity difference with C 2 H 4 (4.2 Å) and CH 4 (3.8 Å), highly efficient separation of C 2 H 2 /C 2 H 4 or C 2 H 2 /CH 4 has been fulfilled in some reported MOFs with benchmark selectivities by pore tuning and pore functionalization strategies. [ 10,11 ] However, compared with the separation of C 2 H 2 /C 2 H 4 and C 2 H 2 /CH 4 , C 2 H 2 /CO 2 separation is much more difficult and challenging because of their very close molecular size/shape (3.3 Å for both C 2 H 2 and CO 2 ) and physical properties.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to their inherent diversity, these materials enable precise control of pore shape, pore chemistry and pore size, thereby providing a versatile platform for separation processes [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . In terms of trace gas removal, numerous studies have focused on the rational design of three-dimensional (3D) MOFs with uniform sub-nanometer pores [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] . Despite significant achievements, designing new materials that outperform existing benchmark adsorbents remains a formidable challenge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the separation selectivity and the capacity of zeolites are still limited by the nature of cationic binding sites and their pore topologies. Porous materials with designable pore topology and selective binding sites open up unexpected possibilities for recognition of xylene isomers [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] . Different kinds of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) or porous coordination polymers, including MIL (Materials of Institut Lavoisier) series and MOFs with coordinatively unsaturated metal sites (CUSs), have been investigated for the separation of xylene isomers, both in vapor and liquid phases [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%