1994
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4068(94)90035-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate preferences and stable coalition structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
118
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
118
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the subclass of tree games Herings et al (2008) recently introduced the average tree solution (AT solution), being the average of the marginal contribution vectors corresponding to all directed spanning trees of the graph. The AT solution is easy to compute and belongs to the core of the game if the game is superadditive, as is proved in Herings et al (2008) and follows from earlier results in Demange (1994Demange ( , 2004, Kaneko and Wooders (1982), and Le Breton et al (1992).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For the subclass of tree games Herings et al (2008) recently introduced the average tree solution (AT solution), being the average of the marginal contribution vectors corresponding to all directed spanning trees of the graph. The AT solution is easy to compute and belongs to the core of the game if the game is superadditive, as is proved in Herings et al (2008) and follows from earlier results in Demange (1994Demange ( , 2004, Kaneko and Wooders (1982), and Le Breton et al (1992).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Nonemptyness of the core under these circumstances has already been shown in Le Breton, Owen and Weber (1992) and Demange (1994). Demange (2004) already mentions that the Core of the restricted game can have extreme points that are not hierarchical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Whenever S is not feasible it can earn the sum of the worths of its components in Myerson (1977) proposes to take for every communication situation the Shapley value (Shapley (1953)) of the corresponding restricted game, a solution that is later named the Myerson value for communication situations. Alternatively, Le Breton, Owen and Weber (1992) and Demange (1994Demange ( , 2004 consider the Core of the restricted game for the special class of communication situations where the game is superadditive and the communication graph is cycle-free, respectively, a tree.…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core of any superadditive game built on intermediate preferences on a tree is non-empty (Demange 1994). In particular the core of a majority game is non-empty under intermediate preferences.…”
Section: Median Representative Rulementioning
confidence: 99%