2007
DOI: 10.12968/ijtr.2007.14.3.23526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate care: An occupational therapy perspective

Abstract: This study aimed to examine the involvement of occupational therapists in the development of intermediate care services in England. A non-experimental survey design was employed and a postal questionnaire was sent to 414 members of the specialist section of the College of Occupational Therapists: Older People. Quantitative and qualitative data from the 159 respondents was analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis respectively. Results indicate that the occupational therapists in this study we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These perspectives included clinical and professional reasoning/decision-making, opinion, perceptions and reflections. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) core guidelines, the National Audit of Intermediate Care (2019) and Grant et al (2007) provided intermediate care definitions. Risk terminology was identified in the Royal College of Occupational Therapists, ‘Embracing risk, Enabling choice’; Department of Health’s, ‘Best Practice in Managing Risk’ and ‘Independence, choice and risk: a guide to best practice in supported decision making’ guidance (DOH, 2007; DOH, 2009; RCOT, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These perspectives included clinical and professional reasoning/decision-making, opinion, perceptions and reflections. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2017) core guidelines, the National Audit of Intermediate Care (2019) and Grant et al (2007) provided intermediate care definitions. Risk terminology was identified in the Royal College of Occupational Therapists, ‘Embracing risk, Enabling choice’; Department of Health’s, ‘Best Practice in Managing Risk’ and ‘Independence, choice and risk: a guide to best practice in supported decision making’ guidance (DOH, 2007; DOH, 2009; RCOT, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second body of literature has explored specific policy and practice change, including the implementation of the Single Assessment Process (Ridout and Mayers, 2006); intermediate care services (Grant et al., 2007); self-assessment (Tucker et al., 2012); personalisation (London-Willis et al., 2012) and the expansion of telecare and assistive technology (Nelson and Senker, 2006; Riley et al., 2008). Related research also investigated how service change impacted upon the role of qualified vis-a-vis assistant-grade practitioners (Mackey, 2005; Nancarrow and Mackey, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include preventative care, with an expansion of such services advocated in Caring for our Future (Department of Health, 2012) and NHS England’s (2014) forward strategy document as a way of reducing reliance on crisis support. The growth of intermediate care has additionally challenged traditional occupational therapy roles (Grant et al., 2007). Importantly, how NHS and local authorities manage boundaries between services has changed, with occupational therapists playing a key role in integrated care through multi-disciplinary working ( Health Service Journal , 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%