1998
DOI: 10.1076/jcen.20.1.107.1487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermanual and Alternate-Form Equivalence on the Trail Making Tests

Abstract: Intermanual discrepancies in performance and alternate-form equivalence on the Trail Making Test were examined among 40 left- and 40 right-hand-preferred normal adults (N = 80). The findings indicate that administration of the Trail Making Tests to the nonpreferred hand does not result in a clinically meaningful difference in score. Neither hand preference nor task complexity (numeric or numeric/lexical) significantly affected the magnitude of the intermanual discrepancy. Mixed-model analyses of variance revea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although patients with frontal lobe damage tended to be slower than the control and nonfrontal groups, patients with left frontal damage were the slowest. Because using the right or left hand to perform the task does not affect the score in any meaningful way (LoSasso, Rapport, Axelrod, & Reeder, 1998), this slowing likely reflects the relationship of the left frontal damage to right-sided motor control. Ninety-five percent of our patients were right-handed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although patients with frontal lobe damage tended to be slower than the control and nonfrontal groups, patients with left frontal damage were the slowest. Because using the right or left hand to perform the task does not affect the score in any meaningful way (LoSasso, Rapport, Axelrod, & Reeder, 1998), this slowing likely reflects the relationship of the left frontal damage to right-sided motor control. Ninety-five percent of our patients were right-handed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A significant performance decline was observed on the RWT semantic category shifting task and the Trail-Making Test B/A ratio. In the case of the latter test, this worsening can be attributed to the fact that the test's alternate form, administered to all controls at the second evaluation, is slightly more difficult than the original form used at baseline [33]. It could be assumed that a number of our control subjects were at an early Alzheimer's disease stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TMT is affected by motor speed and dexterity, and age-related slowing has been attributed to reduced abilities in these areas as well as impaired working memory, poor visual scanning or a combination of cognitive deficits. LoSasso, Rapport, Axelrod, and Reeder (1998) found that subjects can use their non-preferred hand without a significant performance decrement, thus the test may be very useful in certain patients with dominant hand paralysis. The analysis of completion times for Trails A and B is highly sensitive to neurocognitive deficits and to closed head injury, with increased completion times associated with increased injury severity.…”
Section: The Trail Making Test: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%