2012
DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2012.10820538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative Indications for Xhosa Speaking Unskilled Workers on the Trail Making and Stroop Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, although the use of Zambian norms reduced the effect of years of education on NP test performance among SA women, significant effects of years of education persisted, primarily on NP tests of information processing speed. This is consistent with findings among a different sample of Xhosa-speaking South Africans (Andrews, Shuttleworth-Edwards, & Radloff, 2012), suggesting that additional differences in educational background in this highly heterogeneous area may reduce generalizability between settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Second, although the use of Zambian norms reduced the effect of years of education on NP test performance among SA women, significant effects of years of education persisted, primarily on NP tests of information processing speed. This is consistent with findings among a different sample of Xhosa-speaking South Africans (Andrews, Shuttleworth-Edwards, & Radloff, 2012), suggesting that additional differences in educational background in this highly heterogeneous area may reduce generalizability between settings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition to the present study, results arising out of the wider project are in the process of being submitted for publication, or have been published elsewhere (Andrews, Shuttleworth-Edwards, & Radloff, 2012;Fike, Knoetze, Shuttleworth-Edwards, & Radloff, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Importantly, the scores are not so low (i.e., the participants are not performing at the floor of the test), and nor is the organisational strategy employed so disorganised (i.e., rendering the figure unrecognisable), as to preclude the use of this test for diagnostic purposes with such individuals, on the proviso of course that the appropriate leniency in their interpretation on the basis of these normative data is applied. The study output, therefore, can be seen to provide a useful addition to a growing series of norms on westernised neurocognitive tests that have been collected in respect of this young adult Xhosa speaking Eastern Cape group with a relatively disadvan taged educational background from the former DET/ township schools (Andrews et al, 2012;Fike et al, 2012). '…”
Section: Implications For Neuropsychological Practicementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Details are reported in Table 1. Of the remaining 27 studies that provide normative data for non-Italian populations, 16 studies (Ivnik et al, 1996;Ingraham et al, 1988;Rosselli et al, 2002;Moering et al, 2004;Lucas et al, 2005;Steinberg et al, 2005;Seo et al, 2008;Peña-Casanova et al, 2009;Al-Ghatani et al, 2011;Norman et al, 2011;Andrews et al, 2012;Llinàs-Reglà et al, 2013;Morrow, 2013;Lubrini et al, 2014;Rivera et al, 2015;Waldrop-Valverde et al, 2015) adopted the scoring method proposed by Golden (1978). In this method, the number of items correctly named in 45 s in each conditions is calculated (i.e., W, C, CW).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%