1984
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0720213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlitter variation in progeny of chimaeric male mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed by Buehr & McLaren (1984) there are a number of possible ways in which one sperm type might prove more successful than another in producing young, e.g. more efficient sperm transport in the female tract, more rapid sperm capacitation or differential survival of embryos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Buehr & McLaren (1984) there are a number of possible ways in which one sperm type might prove more successful than another in producing young, e.g. more efficient sperm transport in the female tract, more rapid sperm capacitation or differential survival of embryos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon has been reported by others (Mintz. 1968;McLaren, 1975, 1978: Buehr and McLaren, 1984. The fact that in the present investigation the composition of the spermatogonial compartment and of the Ml and Mil spermato cytes was known helps to explain this variance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…A reduction in the size of the spermatogonial compartment, in combination w'ith selective differences at haplophase, automatically increase vari ances in the ratios born within litters. In the work of Buehr and McLaren (1984). part of the variance could be removed by avoiding delayed fertilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since glycolysis is important for ATP generation and fertilization in mouse sperm (Fraser and Quinn, 1981), this would compromise sperm function. Other unknown genetic differences may also result in sperm selection in mixed inseminations as described elsewhere (Edwards, 1955;Overstreet and Adams, 1971;Sharma and Hays, 1975;Buehr and McLaren, 1984;Olds-Clarke, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If, as in our AI experiments, ovulation had already occurred or was occurring at the time of insemination, sperm with more rapid motility, capacitation, or fertilization would be at an advantage. For example, competition between sperm from different mouse strains incorporated into male chimeras was only apparent when mating occurred after ovulation (Buehr and McLaren, 1984). Conversely, prolonged motility or survival might confer a selective advantage if ovulation occurred later and sperm were already waiting in the oviduct (see Braden, 1958;McGrath and Hillman, 1980;Olds-Clarke, 1988, 1997 for discussion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%