2006
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-31770-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interleavers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 83 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, echelle gratings [21], [22] and arrayed waveguide gratings (AWGs) [22]- [24] have been fabricated exhibiting remarkable specifications in C and L bands with up to 32 channels, 200 GHz spacing and sub-mm 2 footprint [24], even though such multiplexing structures typically tended to occupy large area to support many channels with dense spacing. Cascaded asymmetric Mach-Zehnder Interferometers (A-MZIs) serving as interleavers have been also presented, relying however on a full binary tree architecture with N stages for full demultiplexing of 2N channels [25], [26] that leads to subordinate scalability compared to other type of MUX devices (e.g., AWGs) [27]. Moreover, the realization of dense channel spacing comes at the expense of the device footprint, since the channel spacing is inversely proportional to the MZI length asymmetry [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, echelle gratings [21], [22] and arrayed waveguide gratings (AWGs) [22]- [24] have been fabricated exhibiting remarkable specifications in C and L bands with up to 32 channels, 200 GHz spacing and sub-mm 2 footprint [24], even though such multiplexing structures typically tended to occupy large area to support many channels with dense spacing. Cascaded asymmetric Mach-Zehnder Interferometers (A-MZIs) serving as interleavers have been also presented, relying however on a full binary tree architecture with N stages for full demultiplexing of 2N channels [25], [26] that leads to subordinate scalability compared to other type of MUX devices (e.g., AWGs) [27]. Moreover, the realization of dense channel spacing comes at the expense of the device footprint, since the channel spacing is inversely proportional to the MZI length asymmetry [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%