DOI: 10.1007/bfb0120591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interior Penalty Procedures for Elliptic and Parabolic Galerkin Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
349
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
349
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a finite difference-method of characteristics scheme has been considered [5] by one of the authors ; the analysis of that combination is based in part on the results of this paper. It would also be possible to use a finite element-method of characteristics procedure, as was discussed in the thesis of T. F. Russell [11], or an interior penalty Galerkin method [1,3,4,14] ; however, since the main point of this paper is to show the feasibility of the use of the mixed method for the pressure, we shall confine our treatment of the concentration to the single case.…”
Section: Simulation Of Miscible Displacement 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a finite difference-method of characteristics scheme has been considered [5] by one of the authors ; the analysis of that combination is based in part on the results of this paper. It would also be possible to use a finite element-method of characteristics procedure, as was discussed in the thesis of T. F. Russell [11], or an interior penalty Galerkin method [1,3,4,14] ; however, since the main point of this paper is to show the feasibility of the use of the mixed method for the pressure, we shall confine our treatment of the concentration to the single case.…”
Section: Simulation Of Miscible Displacement 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we develop a family of high-order DG methods for the system (1.8). The proposed methods are based on three primal DG methods: the Nonsymmetric Interior Penalty Galerkin (NIPG), the Symmetric Interior Penalty Galerkin (SIPG), and the Incomplete Interior Penalty Galerkin (IIPG) methods, [4,18,19,39]. The numerical fluxes in the proposed DG methods are the fluxes developed for the semidiscrete finite-volume central-upwind schemes in [32] (see also [31,33] and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Continuous Interior Penalty (CIP) method was originally proposed by Douglas and Dupont [9] for parabolic and elliptic equations. The idea was to add a penalization term on the gradient jumps in order to increase robustness for elliptic problems with a dominating convection term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%