Intergroup Comparison versus Intragroup Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social Identity Theory in North American and East Asian Cultural Contexts

Yuki, Masaki

doi:10.2307/1519846

Cited by 275 publications

(279 citation statements)

References 108 publications

(93 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

253

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Prentice et al, 1994) or culture (cf. Yuki, 2003). Instead, we found a significant cross-cultural difference in the extent to which in-group ties predicted self-stereotyping.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 79%

“…In particular, Prentice, Miller, and Lightdale (1994) proposed that some groups operate on the basis of a depersonalized common identity and others operate on the basis of interpersonal bonds. Similarly, Yuki (2003) demonstrated that in-group identification is based on depersonalization in North America and relational interdependence in East Asia (see also Nakashima, Isobe, & Ura, 2012). Contrary to these viewpoints, the present research did not find any evidence that self-stereotyping varied significantly as a function of either group type (cf.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 73%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Uncovering the diverse cultural bases of social identity: In-group ties predict self-stereotyping among individualists but not among collectivists.

Rubin¹

2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Prentice et al, 1994) or culture (cf. Yuki, 2003). Instead, we found a significant cross-cultural difference in the extent to which in-group ties predicted self-stereotyping.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 79%

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 73%

Uncovering the diverse cultural bases of social identity: In-group ties predict self-stereotyping among individualists but not among collectivists.

Rubin¹

2017

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since a variety of research has demonstrated that Japanese are more relationally oriented than Americans (e.g. Markus & Kitayama, 1991;Yuki, 2003), the current study sought to explore similar gender effects in this paradigm. Although no gender differences emerged in Yuki et al's (2005) American sample, we hypothesized that priming both men and women with interdependence could potentially activate pre-existing gender differences in an American sample.…”

Section: The Present Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender Differences in the Relational and Collective Bases for Trust

Maddux¹,

Brewer

2005

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A variety of research suggests that men and women differ in their interdependent orientation: whereas women tend to be more relationally interdependent, men tend to be more collectively interdependent (e.g. Gabriel & Gardner, 1999). The current study sought to investigate differences in interdependence within the domain of trust. In particular, the authors predicted that men would tend to trust individuals based on whether or not they shared group memberships. On the other hand, women were predicted to trust those who shared direct or indirect relationship connections. Results from an online trust-dilemma game supported these predictions. Implications for our understanding of the impact of gender on social identity and self-representation are discussed

show abstract

“…Cultural similarities and differences along national and occupational boundaries form a basis for in-group and out-group comparisons (Rao & Ramachandran, 2011;Trice & Beyer, 1993;Yuki, 2003). Prior research in a variety of disciplines has demonstrated empirically that individuals tend to favor other members in their in-group while discriminating against members in their out-group (Brewer, 1979;Diehl, 1990;Tajfel, 1970;Turner, 1975).…”

Section: National and Occupational Cultural Differencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Noise or Quality? Cross-Nested Hierarchical Effects of Culture on Online Ratings

Mattson¹

2017

CAIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Previous feedback system research in a variety of contexts has focused on the impact that ratings (as proxies for quality) have on a variety of social and economic outcomes with equivocal findings. These mixed findings may be partially due to noise (factors not related to quality) embedded in aggregated or average positive and negative ratings. One significant source of ratings noise may come from culturally diverse raters' issuing ratings in virtual environments. Culture impacts how groups of individuals are socialized to behave and think, which may result in members' having different attitudes towards publicly downgrading (negative ratings) or praising (positive ratings) other members in the feedback system. In this paper, I investigate how culture influences rating practices specifically in public electronic knowledge sharing communities. Using a cross-nested hierarchical linear model, I demonstrate empirically that cultural differences at the community, occupation, and national levels interact in unique ways to increase or decrease an individual's propensity to give and receive a positive or a negative rating. My study contributes to the literature on rating systems along with having practical ramifications for the designers of feedback systems.

show abstract

Intergroup Comparison versus Intragroup Relationships: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social Identity Theory in North American and East Asian Cultural Contexts

Cited by 275 publications

References 108 publications

Uncovering the diverse cultural bases of social identity: In-group ties predict self-stereotyping among individualists but not among collectivists.

Uncovering the diverse cultural bases of social identity: In-group ties predict self-stereotyping among individualists but not among collectivists.

Gender Differences in the Relational and Collective Bases for Trust

Noise or Quality? Cross-Nested Hierarchical Effects of Culture on Online Ratings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About