1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00303523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergeneric asymmetric hybrids between Nicotiana plumbaginifolia and Atropa belladonna obtained by ?gamma-fusion?

Abstract: Asymmetric nuclear hybrids have been obtained by fusion of cells from a nitrate-reductase deficient mutant of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia (cnx20) and gamma irradiated protoplasts of Atropa belladonna (irradiation doses tested were 10, 30, 50 and 100 krad). The hybrid formation frequency following selection for genotypic complementation in the NR function was in the range of 0.7%-3.7%. Cytogenetic studies demonstrated that all hybrid plants tested possessed multiple (generally tetra- or hexaploid) sets of N. plum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species-specific polymorphic markers of nuclear genomes, such as isoenzymes of peroxidases, catalase, malate dehydrogenase, and genes encoding plant tubulins, were assayed in somatic hybrids as described (Kushnir et al, 1991). Karyotypes of somatic hybrids were analyzed by acetoorceine staining of chromosome spreads from dividing cells in root tips (Gleba et al, 1988). Plastome types were identified by RFLP analysis of purified chloroplast DNA or by direct DNA sequencing of relevant PCR-amplified DNA fragments.…”
Section: Generation Of Somatic Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species-specific polymorphic markers of nuclear genomes, such as isoenzymes of peroxidases, catalase, malate dehydrogenase, and genes encoding plant tubulins, were assayed in somatic hybrids as described (Kushnir et al, 1991). Karyotypes of somatic hybrids were analyzed by acetoorceine staining of chromosome spreads from dividing cells in root tips (Gleba et al, 1988). Plastome types were identified by RFLP analysis of purified chloroplast DNA or by direct DNA sequencing of relevant PCR-amplified DNA fragments.…”
Section: Generation Of Somatic Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intergeneric somatic hybrids are usually highly unstable due to spontaneous elimination of parental chromosomes, and the hybrid cells are often non-morphogenic or, once regenerated, infertile (Negrutiu et al, 1989a & b). It is therefore assumed that a directed elimination of the donor chromosomes may help overcome the regeneration and fertility problems in combinations between phylogenetically distant species (Gupta et al, 1984;Bates et al, 1987;Gleba et al, 1988). From a number of recent studies some general conclusions may be made:…”
Section: Selection Of Hybrid Cellsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Preliminary evidence of hybridity can be obtained by scoring the morphology which is often intermediate between the parents . More direct proof can be obtained by biochemical analysis using the isoenzyme pattern (Scandalios & Sorenson, 1977 ;Gleba & Sytnik, 1984) or various types of molecular probes such as species-specific repetitive DNA sequences (Saul & Potrykus, 1984;Imamura et al ., 1987 ;Schweizer et al ., 1988), rDNA (Gleba et al ., 1988) and other RFLP markers Melzer & O'Connell, 1990) . Recently, the use of PCR technology has also been utilized for hybrid identification (Baird et al ., 1992 ;Xu et al ., 1993b) .…”
Section: Identification and Characterization Of Somatic Hybrid Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, asymmetric hybridization has met with mixed results . In general, irradiation reduced the amount of transferred donor DNA but the fraction may vary from a few traits (Dudits et al ., 1987), one or a few chromosomes (Gupta et al ., 1984 ;Bates et al ., 1987a;Melzer & O'Connell, 1992) to numerous chromosomes (Gleba et al ., 1988 ;Famelaer et al ., 1989;Sacristan et al ., 1989 ;Sjodin & Glimelius, 1989b ;Yamashita et al ., 1989 ;Wijbrandi et al ., 1990a, b, c, Wolters et al ., 1991Derks et al ., 1992) the latter result being obtained in the majority of cases . Furthermore, chromosome elimination is random and it is not possible to predict which of the chromosomes will be lost .…”
Section: Symmetric Vs Asymmetric Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%