2012
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbs050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergenerational Relationship Quality Across Three Generations

Abstract: Findings are consistent with the intergenerational stake hypothesis and only partially consistent with the theory of intergenerational transmission. Overall, this study suggests that there is greater within-family variability than similarities in how family members feel about one another.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
9
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The items were averaged to create a negative mother and a negative father relationship quality score (Wave 1: r s = .54, .54; Wave 2: r s = .62, .62, respectively). The small number of relationship items may underestimate the reliability of the negative quality scale (Carmines & Zeller, 1979), although similar reliability estimates are found in other research using the same or similar relationship items (Birditt et al, 2010; Birditt, Tighe, Fingerman, & Zarit, 2012; Fingerman et al, 2008; Umberson, 1992). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The items were averaged to create a negative mother and a negative father relationship quality score (Wave 1: r s = .54, .54; Wave 2: r s = .62, .62, respectively). The small number of relationship items may underestimate the reliability of the negative quality scale (Carmines & Zeller, 1979), although similar reliability estimates are found in other research using the same or similar relationship items (Birditt et al, 2010; Birditt, Tighe, Fingerman, & Zarit, 2012; Fingerman et al, 2008; Umberson, 1992). …”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…More recently begun, the Family Exchanges Study (FES) interviewed more than 600 three‐generation families between 2008 and 2013. Taken together, the PSID, LSOG, FTP, and FES have facilitated the examination of a wide range of multigenerational topics, such as class mobility (Hertel & Groh‐Samberg, ), the transmission of health and health behaviors (Davis, McGonagle, Schoeni, & Stafford, ), intergenerational relationship quality (Birditt et al, ), the transmission of beliefs and values (Bengtson, Copen, Putney, & Silverstein, ), and the role of genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors (Conger, Belsky, & Capaldi, ).…”
Section: Data and Methodological Approaches To Studying Multigeneratimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although parent-child and in-law ties have unique dimensions, both types of intergenerational relationships are primarily theorized within a solidarity-conflict perspective (Birditt, Tighe, Fingerman, & Zarit, 2012). This approach emphasizes that both solidarity and conflict are normative aspects of intergenerational ties from adolescence to later life (Bengtson, Rosenthal, & Burton, 1995;Lowenstein, 2007;Silverstein & Bengtson, 1997) and highlights six dimensions of intergenerational relationships: affectual solidarity (e.g., emotional attachment), associational solidarity (e.g., frequency of contact), consensual solidarity (e.g., agreement on values), functional solidarity (e.g., exchange of resources), normative solidarity (e.g., commitment to family obligations), and structural solidarity (e.g., structural contexts) (Bengtson, Giarrusso, Mabry, & Silverstein, RECZEK 2002).…”
Section: Theoretical Approaches To Parent-child and In-law Tiesmentioning
confidence: 99%