2002
DOI: 10.1093/geront/42.3.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergenerational Partnerships in Adult Day Centers

Abstract: This study explores the influence of intergenerational programming in adult day centers, and bridges the gap between theory and practice with implications for other aging services.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite some evidences on the efficacy of this approach [17], its use is still not widespread because of some ethical concerns and lack of solid scientific evidences. Amongst the ethical concerns feelings of infantilizing the patient [43] and difficulties in finding the target patient for the treatment [44] have been raised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite some evidences on the efficacy of this approach [17], its use is still not widespread because of some ethical concerns and lack of solid scientific evidences. Amongst the ethical concerns feelings of infantilizing the patient [43] and difficulties in finding the target patient for the treatment [44] have been raised.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, 1062 initial codes were combined into 17 themes (see Table 1 ); axial coding involved a process of reviewing the themes and placing them into subcategories around the phenomena of care environment. Previous ADS ethnographic studies examining the environment used structured subcategories to do the axial coding [ 5 , 22 , 23 ]. To bring coherence to the analysis and identify patterns to inform environment-enhancing strategies, we structured subcategories with a simple distinction between appropriate and inappropriate physical and social features (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons I chose those factors were because, while the extant evaluations of these components are limited, these components are presumed to be critically important to the success of IGPs. For example, lack of support, along with inappropriate activities, was identified as a main reason for the demise of a program (Deutchman, Bruno, & Jarrott, 2003;Salari, 2002). The following section describes these IGP components that are key to program development and may serve as potential moderators.…”
Section: Program Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%