2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/5130472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Their Voices: Client and Staff Perceptions of the Physical and Social Environments of Adult Day Services Centers in Taiwan

Abstract: Studies have examined the impact of environments on long-term care residents' quality of life; however, environment gets little attention in adult day services (ADS). The current study gives voice to clients and staff by capturing their perceptions of the physical and social environments of their ADS centers. Data were collected from 23 interviews with staff and clients and 270 hours of participant observations at two ADS centers in Taiwan. The authors triangulated field notes with interview transcriptions and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elsewhere, we have reported that the joint third highest domain of gain, when impact of attendance was measured using the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT), was that of feeling in control of what attenders did at centres and when they did it (Orellana et al, 2020a). This contrasts starkly with reports of infantilization and constraints to autonomy within some day centre settings (Liou & Jarrott, 2018;Salari, 2005). Additionally, this study's attenders were assertively appreciative and knew how to deal with problems with the ultimate choice, in line with Sheikh et al's (2012) finding, to stop attending if unhappy with service quality.…”
Section: Consideration Of Day Centres In Relation To Thementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Elsewhere, we have reported that the joint third highest domain of gain, when impact of attendance was measured using the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT), was that of feeling in control of what attenders did at centres and when they did it (Orellana et al, 2020a). This contrasts starkly with reports of infantilization and constraints to autonomy within some day centre settings (Liou & Jarrott, 2018;Salari, 2005). Additionally, this study's attenders were assertively appreciative and knew how to deal with problems with the ultimate choice, in line with Sheikh et al's (2012) finding, to stop attending if unhappy with service quality.…”
Section: Consideration Of Day Centres In Relation To Thementioning
confidence: 97%