Intergenerational Activities that Promote Engaging Conversations are Preferred among Young and Older Adults

Aguilera-Hermida, A. Patricia; Anderson, Ellen; Negrón, Vanessa A.

doi:10.1080/15350770.2019.1608346

Cited by 11 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…IGPs are designed to: (1) foster positive relationships and mutual understanding between generations (Canning et al, 2018); (2) reduce negative perceptions of the other generation (Gaggioli et al, 2014;Meshel and McGlynn, 2004); and/or (3) improve physical and mental health outcomes among participants (Murayama et al, 2015;Perry and Weatherby, 2011), decrease loneliness (Aguilera-Hermida et al, 2020), and increase social connection (MacCallum et al, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Processes and structures in intergenerational programs: a comparison across different types of programs

Cohen‐Mansfield

Muff

2021

Int. Psychogeriatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Given the widely acknowledged benefits of intergenerational programs (IGPs), we compared processes and structures across different IGP types and explored potential areas for improvement. Design: Thirteen IGPs were classified into three types: arts, learning, and assistance programs. Data were collected through direct structured interviews and analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Setting: Participants were recruited from community-based IGPs in the greater Tel Aviv area of Israel. Participants: Eighty-four older participants (OPs), 97 younger participants (YPs), and 21 organizers were interviewed. Measurements: Questions included participant demographics as well as closed- and open-ended questions regarding processes based on the Impact of Intergenerational Programs Questionnaire (IIPQ). Analysis: Responses to closed-ended questions were compared among IGP types and age groups using two-way ANOVAs for ordinal data, and chi-squares for nominal data. Responses to open-ended questions by OP, YP, and program organizers about potential areas for improvement were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Processes in need of improvement were preparation and guidance, length of program participation, and monitoring of activities, which differed across IGP types and age groups. These processes were related to broader structural problems such as lack of resources, organizers’ poor employment conditions, and inadequate public services for older persons in Israel. Conclusions: Our study highlights the complex relationships between IGP types, processes, and structures. IGP processes and goals can be hindered by structural variables such as insufficient funding, infrastructure, and public services for older adults.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Processes and structures in intergenerational programs: a comparison across different types of programs

Cohen‐Mansfield

Muff

2021

Int. Psychogeriatr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Preparing the younger generation to understand and support an aging society yields a multitude of benefits that enhance social cohesion, economic stability, and overall societal well-being. One of the primary advantages is the reduction of ageism, which is often rooted in misconceptions and stereotypes about aging [ 15 - 17 , 32 ]. Educational programs that include aging studies and intergenerational activities have been shown to reduce prejudices and foster empathy among young people [ 21 - 24 ].…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preparing the Younger Generation for an Aging Society: Strategies, Challenges, and Opportunities

Mohd. Tohit,

Haque

2024

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…IGPs can address social isolation and loneliness for both generations [ 11 ]. IGPs are designed to create positive relationships between generations [ 12 ], reduce negative perceptions of the other generation [ 13 ], improve physical and mental health outcomes [ 14 , 15 ], decrease loneliness [ 16 ], and increase social connection [ 17 ]. Peacock and O’Quin (2006) [ 18 ] claimed that bridging generational gaps through IGPs “can … foster the development of new roles, and provide purpose and meaning in a life stage where limited opportunities for such may exist” (p. 368).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Motivation to Participate in Intergenerational Programs: A Comparison across Different Program Types and Generations

Cohen‐Mansfield

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much research has attested to the benefits of intergenerational programs (IGPs) for older and younger participants, but there is a lack of understanding about what motivates them to participate and to persevere. We conducted structured interviews with 83 older (mean age = 77) and 96 younger (mean age = 23) participants who participated in 13 IGPs in Israel, some involving specific topics, and some providing assistance to older adults. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed differences in motivation across generations and program types and compared initial and ongoing motivation to participate. We found differences regarding motivation by age group and program type: Among older participants, interest in the specific subject was a more prevalent motivation in topic-focused groups, while receiving support was more common in assistance groups. Among young persons, motivations relating to obligation, such as receipt of a financial scholarship, and the wish to help others were the most prevalent motivators. Ongoing motivation was often explained by positive intergenerational relationships and enjoyment. For older adults, offering more diverse topic-focused activities may motivate greater participation. For young adults, integrating IGPs within more and different settings, and promoting IGPs as opportunities to help others are potential motivators.

show abstract

Intergenerational Activities that Promote Engaging Conversations are Preferred among Young and Older Adults

Cited by 11 publications

References 28 publications

Processes and structures in intergenerational programs: a comparison across different types of programs

Processes and structures in intergenerational programs: a comparison across different types of programs

Preparing the Younger Generation for an Aging Society: Strategies, Challenges, and Opportunities

Motivation to Participate in Intergenerational Programs: A Comparison across Different Program Types and Generations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About