2007
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/9/015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interferometric measurement of a diffusion coefficient: comparison of two methods and uncertainty analysis

Abstract: Two methods to measure the diffusion coefficient of a species in a liquid by optical interferometry were compared. The methods were tested on a 1.75 M NaCl aqueous solution diffusing into water at 26 °C. Results were D = 1.587 × 10−9 m2 s−1 with the first method and D = 1.602 × 10−9 m2 s−1 with the second method. Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the possible dispersion of these results. The standard uncertainties were found to be of the order of 0.05 × 10−9 m2 s−1 with both methods. We found that the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2)], we find that after about 100 s the evaporation-caused surface propagation towards the interior becomes larger than the diffusion path of the FS particles ( Figure S4) so that this diffusion can no longer balance out the effects of surface propagation. In contrast, the electrolyte concentration profile remains homogeneous throughout the droplet as the salt ions, with " D NaCl for NaCl being 1.6 10 À5 cm 2 s À1 , [17] diffuse rapidly enough to avoid gradients during the evaporation time until the drying of the droplet is complete.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2)], we find that after about 100 s the evaporation-caused surface propagation towards the interior becomes larger than the diffusion path of the FS particles ( Figure S4) so that this diffusion can no longer balance out the effects of surface propagation. In contrast, the electrolyte concentration profile remains homogeneous throughout the droplet as the salt ions, with " D NaCl for NaCl being 1.6 10 À5 cm 2 s À1 , [17] diffuse rapidly enough to avoid gradients during the evaporation time until the drying of the droplet is complete.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative importance of the advection and diffusion are important. The ions of salts are relatively small and diffuse about 4 times more rapidly (Riquelme et al, 2007) than the larger FL ions (Casalini et al, 2011). Because of this, the osmolarity in the TBU starts to drop by 15 s post-blink, even though fluid motion is toward the center of TBU.…”
Section: Interblinkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the best known is the Michelson who has had many applications ranging from measurements of sample thickness [2], temperature sensor [3], measurement of diffusion coefficients [4], among others.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%