Interference patterns in subject-verb agreement and reflexives revisited: A large-sample study

Abstract

Cue-based retrieval theories in sentence processing predict two classes of interference effect: (i) Inhibitory interference is predicted when multiple items match a retrieval cue: cue-overloading leads to an overall slowdown in reading time; and (ii) Facilitatory interference arises when a retrieval target as well as a distractor only partially match the retrieval cues; this partial matching leads to an overall speedup in retrieval time. Inhibitory interference effects are widely observed, but facilitatory interference apparently has an exception: reflexives have been claimed to show no facilitatory interference effects. Because the claim is based on underpowered studies, we conducted a large-sample experiment that investigated both facilitatory and inhibitory interference. In contrast to previous studies, we find facilitatory interference effects in reflexives. We also present a quantitative evaluation of the cue-based retrieval model of Engelmann et al. (2019), with respect to the reflexives data. Data and code are available from: https://osf.io/reavs/.

Modeling Sentence Comprehension Deficits in Aphasia: A Computational Evaluation of the Direct-access Model of Retrieval

“…Interference effects have been attested in multiple studies, see for example Jäger et al (2020); Gordon et al (2006); Jäger et al (2017); Van Dyke (2007). One model of cue-based retrieval that predicts these interference effects is the directaccess model developed by McElree and colleagues (McElree, 2000;McElree et al, 2003;Martin and McElree, 2008).…”