2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference of intradermal tuberculin tests on the serodiagnosis of paratuberculosis in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Johnin skin test for paratuberculosis, which is interpreted as positive when skin thickness increased ≥4 mm, is a specific and low-cost test for the early diagnosis of paratuberculosis in the majority of dairy herds, although the specificity of both tests is influenced by batch of PPD antigen and varies among herds (Kalis et al 2003). Although very few studies (n=3) in the present review determined prevalences using this type of tests, previous information from Brazilian studies suggests that the intradermal tuberculin tests can interfere in the reliability of ELISA (Lilenbaun et al 2007(Lilenbaun et al , 2009Varges et al 2009) and that serological testing for PTB should be avoided for 90 days after PPD inoculation ). Studies on paratuberculosis in Latin America and the Caribbean rarely reported tuberculosis status or previous tuberculin tests before paratuberculosis testing, which could suggest that results could be higher than reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The Johnin skin test for paratuberculosis, which is interpreted as positive when skin thickness increased ≥4 mm, is a specific and low-cost test for the early diagnosis of paratuberculosis in the majority of dairy herds, although the specificity of both tests is influenced by batch of PPD antigen and varies among herds (Kalis et al 2003). Although very few studies (n=3) in the present review determined prevalences using this type of tests, previous information from Brazilian studies suggests that the intradermal tuberculin tests can interfere in the reliability of ELISA (Lilenbaun et al 2007(Lilenbaun et al , 2009Varges et al 2009) and that serological testing for PTB should be avoided for 90 days after PPD inoculation ). Studies on paratuberculosis in Latin America and the Caribbean rarely reported tuberculosis status or previous tuberculin tests before paratuberculosis testing, which could suggest that results could be higher than reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Two international studies, one conducted in Brazil (21), and the second in the UK (24), have previously shown that tests for bTB interfere with MAP ELISA diagnostics. Varges et al (21) reported ELISA interference occurring between 30 and 90 days post-PPD administration in bTB and MAP negative cattle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAP infection can interfere with specificity of bTB diagnostics (19), and likewise M. bovis infection can affect MAP serological tests (20). Varges et al (21), has also shown interference by both single and comparative intradermal bTB tests on MAP sero diagnostics in bTB negative animals. The primary purpose of this current study was to investigate the impact of SICCT on the prevalence of ELISA positive results (serum and milk) in an Irish herd containing both MAP ELISA seropositive and seronegative animals over a period of 6 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, some of our ELISA-A-positive results could be false positive, especially in those animals in which ELISA-B (absorbed test) and PCR produced negative results. Likewise, it is possible that some of the positive ELISA results have been produced due to the interference with tuberculin from intradermal test applied occasionally to some animals, in order to declare herds as free from bovine tuberculosis (Varges et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%