6th Fluid and PlasmaDynamics Conference 1973
DOI: 10.2514/6.1973-678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interference heating due to shock wave impingement on laminar boundary layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11, the separation and attachment states both satisfy Eq.9, and the exponent b Sep ≈ b Att ≈ 0.7 are indicated by the tendency. The exponent is in accordance with the laminar/laminar interference of Hung 29 , while the coefficient a Sep = 1.4 > a Att = 1.05 > 1.0. The discrepancy of coefficient may result from the lower estimate of St re f by Eckert's method 45 than measured values, which can be found in Ref.…”
Section: St Pksupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…11, the separation and attachment states both satisfy Eq.9, and the exponent b Sep ≈ b Att ≈ 0.7 are indicated by the tendency. The exponent is in accordance with the laminar/laminar interference of Hung 29 , while the coefficient a Sep = 1.4 > a Att = 1.05 > 1.0. The discrepancy of coefficient may result from the lower estimate of St re f by Eckert's method 45 than measured values, which can be found in Ref.…”
Section: St Pksupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The discrepancy of coefficient may result from the lower estimate of St re f by Eckert's method 45 than measured values, which can be found in Ref. 29 . Larger coefficient of separation states indicates higher peak heat fluxes than that of the attachment states with the same pressure rise.…”
Section: St Pkmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations