2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial properties of acidified skim milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the hydroxyapatite surface is also positively charged at the pH values used in this study, electrostatic interactions between casein and hydroxyapatite are unlikely, but our results indicate that adsorption occurs nonetheless. This is perhaps driven mainly by hydrophobic interactions, in agreement with the enhancement of casein adsorption at an oil-water interface at low pH (35).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…As the hydroxyapatite surface is also positively charged at the pH values used in this study, electrostatic interactions between casein and hydroxyapatite are unlikely, but our results indicate that adsorption occurs nonetheless. This is perhaps driven mainly by hydrophobic interactions, in agreement with the enhancement of casein adsorption at an oil-water interface at low pH (35).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This second stage would correspond to a slow unfolding and molecular rearrangement such as intermolecular association or aggregation of the individual unfolded protein molecules at the interface. As consequence of these structural modifications, additional protein layers could be formed 21 and a continuous membrane can take place at the oil-water interface 25 . As shown Figure 1 (curve 2), under acidic condition, pea protein exhibited a slower lowering of the interfacial tension and adsorption equilibrium is reached after about 8,000 s. The initial slope dγ/dt (extracted from Figure 1) were significantly affected depending on the pH value and results showed that the initial slope dγ/dt developed by pea protein at pH 2.4 was inhibited dg=dt j j$ 4:67 Â 10 À3 mNm À1 s À1 À Á as compared to pH 7.0 dg=dt j j$ 23:33 Â 10 À3 mNm À1 s À1 À Á .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation amplitude of area is 10%. Measurements were carried out as previously described by 21 . Under these conditions and for a concentration of pea protein isolate of 0.04 wt.%, the interface was fully covered and only a very small amount of protein remained in the bulk phase 22 necessary for the clarity of the medium.…”
Section: Interfacial Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After mixing and pasteurization (80°C during 30 s), 0.8w/w% NaCl was added. To prevent bacterial growth, 0.2w/w% sodium azide was added to the mixture as previously done by Cases et al (2005). Rennetting was done with addition of 25 lL of rennet for 1 L of preparation (''Chymax plus'', Chr Hansen, France).…”
Section: Processed Cheesementioning
confidence: 99%