2018
DOI: 10.1080/09276440.2018.1499328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interfacial adhesion: improving the mechanical properties of silicon nitride fibre - epoxy polymer composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these data, shear strength and energy to shear were calculated. The nature of the test does not allow calculation of Young's modulus or elongation to shear [42]. Shear strength is calculated based on Equation (28):…”
Section: Shear Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these data, shear strength and energy to shear were calculated. The nature of the test does not allow calculation of Young's modulus or elongation to shear [42]. Shear strength is calculated based on Equation (28):…”
Section: Shear Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full analysis of the fibres has been previously reported by the authors [23]. The surface area of the fibres was previously reported as 4.04 m 2 /g [24] while the surface area of Alumix 123 was calculated to be 0.02-0.03 m 2 /g from the manufacturer's specifications. 3 , respectively, which were comparable with other investigations and the manufacturer's specifications [25].…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A calculation was performed on the relative surface area of the Si 3 N 4 reinforcement and Alumix 123. At 0.5% addition, it was determined that this was proportional to a monolayer coverage of the Alumix 123 (SSA addivite × vol.% = SSA matrix ) [24] taking into account that a cohesive monolayer of a solid on another solid is unrealistic. Following this calculation, excess solid reinforcement will lead to agglomeration of ceramic reinforcement and it is possible that this is a reason why 1% Si 3 N 4 composites demonstrated less densification than 0.5%.…”
Section: Elastic Modulusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13−16 On the other hand, strong adhesion between different phases is needed for the structural integrity of miniscale MEMS. 13,17 Currently, there are no explicit theories that can quantitatively explain the magnitude of the adhesive force between two materials forming interfacial bonding. There are limited findings that explain how bonding occurs at an interface where there is no atomic diffusion taking place (e.g., nonmetallic interfacial systems).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhesive force is a type of attractive interaction , between two different substances, which is of importance to many material systems and phenomena, for example, surface adsorption for surface functionalization and catalytic processes, adherence of coatings to the substrate, interfacial binding in multiphase materials, and so forth. Knowing the adhesion between two substances is essential for material design and selection. For instance, adhesive force should be kept at the minimum to reduce friction and minimize adhesive wear of components in dynamics contact in various devices. Adhesive force may cause vibration and seizure of moving parts, leading to complete breakdown of the entire system. , The adhesive force is more critical in MEMS or BioMEMS applications due to their small sizes (sometimes in the order of nanometers), which may cause malfunction of relevant devices. On the other hand, strong adhesion between different phases is needed for the structural integrity of miniscale MEMS. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%