The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface formation evolution of the hot-forged copper-(Cr)diamond composite and its thermal conductivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, when the pressure is below 400MPa, the particle size of TiC on diamond-( 111) is coarser than that on the diamond-(100) facets, while as the pressing pressure is higher than 400MPa, the average size of TiC on diamond-( 111) is smaller than that on diamond-(100) facets. This indicates that diamond-(111) facet has a relatively fast growth rate of TiC compared to diamond-(100) facet under the pressure of 300MPa, this is attributed to diamond-(100) has higher surface energy than diamond-(111), therefore, there will be a surface reconstruction on (100) facet before the reaction between Ti and C atoms, and the sp 2 carbon is easier to be formed on the diamond-(111) which are used to react with Ti coating [16], and the growth rate of TiC on the diamond-(100) exceeds that on the diamond-(111) facets as the hot-pressing pressure is above 400MPa because diamond-(100) facets have less C-C bonds need to be broken to form TiC after the surface reconstruction [17].…”
Section: Composite Materials Powder Metallurgy and Functional Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when the pressure is below 400MPa, the particle size of TiC on diamond-( 111) is coarser than that on the diamond-(100) facets, while as the pressing pressure is higher than 400MPa, the average size of TiC on diamond-( 111) is smaller than that on diamond-(100) facets. This indicates that diamond-(111) facet has a relatively fast growth rate of TiC compared to diamond-(100) facet under the pressure of 300MPa, this is attributed to diamond-(100) has higher surface energy than diamond-(111), therefore, there will be a surface reconstruction on (100) facet before the reaction between Ti and C atoms, and the sp 2 carbon is easier to be formed on the diamond-(111) which are used to react with Ti coating [16], and the growth rate of TiC on the diamond-(100) exceeds that on the diamond-(111) facets as the hot-pressing pressure is above 400MPa because diamond-(100) facets have less C-C bonds need to be broken to form TiC after the surface reconstruction [17].…”
Section: Composite Materials Powder Metallurgy and Functional Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%