2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4929990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface Fe magnetic moment enhancement in MgO/Fe/MgO trilayers

Abstract: We model room temperature soft x-ray resonant magnetic reflectivity to determine a 24% increase of the Fe magnetic moment of the 2–3 monolayers next to both MgO interfaces in a MgO(3 nm)/Fe(12 nm)/MgO(001) heterostructure. This direct measurement of such enhanced interface magnetic moments for buried interfaces confirms theoretical predictions and highlights the importance of considering inhomogeneous in-depth magnetic profile in Fe/MgO based magnetic tunnel junctions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the reverse setup, a single layer of MgO on Fe(001), DFT predicts a somewhat smaller but still enhanced moment in the interface Fe layer of 2.64 µ B 28 , while Ozeki et al calculated 2.75 µ B for a Fe 5 /(MgO) 5 heterostructure 29 . An enhanced moment of the Fe interface layer was also confirmed in experiment [30][31][32] , although no interfacial Fe moment enhancement was inferred from other experiments 23 . As pointed out by Feng et al 15 , electronic structure, magnetization of the interface layer and consequently also the electronic transport properties are strongly affected by the interface relaxation and sensitive to the choice of the exchange-correlation functional in the calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…For the reverse setup, a single layer of MgO on Fe(001), DFT predicts a somewhat smaller but still enhanced moment in the interface Fe layer of 2.64 µ B 28 , while Ozeki et al calculated 2.75 µ B for a Fe 5 /(MgO) 5 heterostructure 29 . An enhanced moment of the Fe interface layer was also confirmed in experiment [30][31][32] , although no interfacial Fe moment enhancement was inferred from other experiments 23 . As pointed out by Feng et al 15 , electronic structure, magnetization of the interface layer and consequently also the electronic transport properties are strongly affected by the interface relaxation and sensitive to the choice of the exchange-correlation functional in the calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Among other possible sources of the discrepancies could be the value of the effective Fe moment in the proximity to the Fe/MgO interface. Some reports point towards interfacial magnetic moments at ferromagnet/oxide interfaces enhanced up to 25% 29 , 30 . Our simulations, however, show that the critical values of the surface anisotropy (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the in-plane rotations, the magneticfield magnitude was kept at 70-120 Oe, far away from the soft Fe(001) and hard Fe/Co layer switching fields obtained from in-plane TMRs (see the Supplemental Material S1 and S2 [49], which also incudes Refs. [50][51][52][53][54][55]). This way, only the soft layer is rotated, and the difference in resistance can be attributed to the angle between the soft and hard layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%