2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interface Behavior of Woven Geotextile with Rounded and Angular Particle Sand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The direct shear test has been used to determine shear strength properties of various soilstructure interfaces. Such applications of direct shear testing range from fundamental studies on the effects of dilatancy (Simoni and Houlsby, 2006), particle size (Yu et al, 2006) and shear box platen fixities (Jewell, 1986) to field applications including skin friction generated between various construction materials (Potyondy, 1961), geosynthetic-reinforced structures (Anubhav and Basudhar, 2013;Arulrajah et al, 2013), large-scale hydropower projects, and excavations of lunar regoliths (Iai and Luna, 2011). Direct shear tests can be conducted under conditions of constant normal load (CNL), constant normal stiffness (CNS), or constant volume (CV) (Pellet and Keshavarz, 2014).…”
Section: Direct Shear Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct shear test has been used to determine shear strength properties of various soilstructure interfaces. Such applications of direct shear testing range from fundamental studies on the effects of dilatancy (Simoni and Houlsby, 2006), particle size (Yu et al, 2006) and shear box platen fixities (Jewell, 1986) to field applications including skin friction generated between various construction materials (Potyondy, 1961), geosynthetic-reinforced structures (Anubhav and Basudhar, 2013;Arulrajah et al, 2013), large-scale hydropower projects, and excavations of lunar regoliths (Iai and Luna, 2011). Direct shear tests can be conducted under conditions of constant normal load (CNL), constant normal stiffness (CNS), or constant volume (CV) (Pellet and Keshavarz, 2014).…”
Section: Direct Shear Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct shear test was simulated by applying a constant normal stress on the top of soil surface and then applying fixed horizontal velocity to all the elements of upper part for displacement of upper soil block. In the present study the non-linear model was verified using the published experimental results of direct shear tests conducted by Anubhav and Basudhar [12]. Experiments were conducted in a conventional size modified direct shear box using two sands having different shaped grains (one having angular grains-Kalpi Sand and other having rounded grains-Ennore Sand).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the numerical analysis of the reinforced soil structures, generally linear elastic interface model with Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion is used. Experimental observations showed that the force-displacement relationships of sand-geotextile interfaces are nonlinear in both peak and post-peak ranges [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. For correct predictions of behaviour of the reinforced soil structures, it is also necessary to correctly incorporate the soilgeosynthetic interface behaviour in the numerical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strain rates of shear tests were varied over a wide range based on the permeability of materials for ensuring proper dissipation of excess pore pressures as per the recommendations of [23,24]. Direct shear test is a robust device for quickly evaluating the shear characteristics of given soil material [25][26][27]. Also direct shear test can be easily modified to determine interface shear characteristics, replacing one half with different material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%