2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839x.2012.01374.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interethnic relations in Malaysia: Group identifications, indispensability and inclusive nationhood

Abstract: This paper focuses on interethnic relations in Malaysia and examines survey data collected among Malay (n = 405), Chinese (n = 90), and Indian (n = 53) participants. In agreement with the Common In‐group Identity Model, inclusive nationhood was related to more positive out‐group attitudes. Relative in‐group indispensability was related to higher bias as predicted by the In‐group Projection Model. Furthermore, the dominant group of Malay had higher in‐group indispensability, more strongly endorsed an inclusive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The predictions of the common ingroup identity model were recently examined among majority and minority groups specifically exploring the new concept of relative ingroup indispensability, that is, whether subgroups consider themselves to be an indispensable, complementary part of the superordinate category. Results revealed that, in line with the common ingroup identity model, dual-identification was related to more positive outgroup attitudes (Ng Tseung-Wong, & Verkuyten, 2010;Verkuyten & Khan, 2012). However, relative ingroup indispensability was associated with higher bias for both majority and minority groups (Ng Tseung-Wong & Verkuyten, 2010).…”
Section: Common Identities and Perceived Indispensability: How Much Dsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predictions of the common ingroup identity model were recently examined among majority and minority groups specifically exploring the new concept of relative ingroup indispensability, that is, whether subgroups consider themselves to be an indispensable, complementary part of the superordinate category. Results revealed that, in line with the common ingroup identity model, dual-identification was related to more positive outgroup attitudes (Ng Tseung-Wong, & Verkuyten, 2010;Verkuyten & Khan, 2012). However, relative ingroup indispensability was associated with higher bias for both majority and minority groups (Ng Tseung-Wong & Verkuyten, 2010).…”
Section: Common Identities and Perceived Indispensability: How Much Dsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Research reveals that perceptions of relative ingroup indispensability can be a mechanism for claiming ingroup superiority and exceptionalism (Ng Tseung-Wong, & Verkuyten, 2010;Verkuyten & Khan, 2012), whereas perceived outgroup indispensability reflects more valuable views of an outgroup, which can foster more positive outgroup attitudes and more harmonious intergroup relations We propose that different types of indispensability are helpful to capture the complexity of multi-ethnic societies resulting from globalization and the increased flow of international migrants. However, as we explain in the following, the positive intergroup consequences of perceived outgroup indispensability are limited to those citizens who endorse civic (i. e., more inclusive) definitions of who can and who cannot be regarded officially as citizens.…”
Section: We Need Them But For Different Reasons: Identity and Functimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Researchers have explored the links between variety of factors and academic achievement, such as self-efficacy (Bandura, 1997), cultural expectations (Ginsburg, 1992, and gender (Gibbons, 2000) are likely to influence international students' success. Since Malaysian culture represent diverse multi-ethnic and multi-cultural society (Verkuyten & Khan, 2012;Janssens et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foi inicialmente definida como indispensabilidade categórica (i.e., identitária), ou seja, a noção de que os grupos, dentro de uma categoria supraordenada, são percebidos como partes necessárias para a definição de uma identidade social (Ng Tseung-Wong & Verkuyten, 2010;Verkuyten et al, 2014). A investigação tem revelado que as percepções de indispensabilidade endogrupal relativa podem surgir como um mecanismo de afirmação da superioridade endogrupal, estando desta forma relacionadas com atitudes intergrupais menos positivas (Ng Tseung-Wong & Verkuyten, 2010;Verkuyten & Khan, 2012). No entanto, outros estudos revelaram que a indispensabilidade percebida do exogrupo esteve associada a atitudes intergrupais mais positivas.…”
Section: Indispensabilidade Identitária E Funcionalunclassified