2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-007-9224-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interethnic Differences (or Similarities?) in the Relative Individuation of Women and Men

Abstract: What roles do ethnicity, gender, and attitudes play in determining whether a person will be perceived as a unique individual versus a homogenized group member? Attitudes toward women's roles have been found to predict Whites' relative individuation of women and men; however, African Americans were found to individuate women and men equally, regardless of attitude . Using a name-trait matching paradigm, the present research found that when targets were identified as African American, African American participan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as in Stewart et al (2000), no significant effects of attitudes toward women on relative memory for men and women were found for African‐American participants. A recent study by Stewart, Jaspers, and Estes (2005) clarified the probable reason for this null effect. Participants may have assumed that the targets, for whom no ethnicity was specified, were White.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as in Stewart et al (2000), no significant effects of attitudes toward women on relative memory for men and women were found for African‐American participants. A recent study by Stewart, Jaspers, and Estes (2005) clarified the probable reason for this null effect. Participants may have assumed that the targets, for whom no ethnicity was specified, were White.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%