2011
DOI: 10.1080/19331681.2010.508003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interest Group Activism on the Web: The Case of Environmental Organizations

Abstract: This study evaluates interest group activity on the Internet, addressing two sets of questions. First, has the Internet allowed small or poorly funded groups to compete equally with well-resourced organizations? Second, to what extent do group characteristics explain their online activities? Using a sample of 200 environmental groups, I evaluate which Web sites receive the most exposure and identify features facilitating information dissemination and public participation. The results indicate that well-resourc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of these organizations were identified through a larger study of 200 U.S. environmental groups (Merry, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these organizations were identified through a larger study of 200 U.S. environmental groups (Merry, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, if this were a large undiscovered trove, many would have ended up on the NC-NAACP Facebook page liking posts or on Twitter tweeting with "Moral Monday," which was not the case in the early stages. Furthermore, some research shows that more organization does lead to more digital engagement over the long term (Eimhjellen, Wollebaek, & Strømsnes, 2013;Merry, 2011;Schradie, 2018).…”
Section: The Strength Of Strong Tiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been institutionally acknowledged in different countries where email has become the official or preferred form of public communication with policymakers [20,21]. 1 The increased and institutionalized use of electronic mail and other digital tools such as policymakers' personal social media accounts [22] also encourage their adaptation among ENGOs, creating a cycle of reliance on such tools for direct information flow. Newer digital technologies provide even more interactive capacity to engage with policymakers in diverse ways and have also become institutionalized to some degree [23], suggesting that additional digital developments will increasingly be integrated in governance practices and within the repertoires of ENGOs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%