Abstract:Resumo O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar a relação entre interesses expressos e inventariados de estudantes de Psicologia por áreas de atuação da profissão. Participaram 392 estudantes, predominantemente do sexo feminino e provenientes de instituições particulares do estado de São Paulo. Para a coleta de dados foi utilizada a Escala de Interesses por Áreas da Psicologia (EIAPsi) e um questionário de identificação. Os resultados da análise de variância mostraram que para todos os fatores do instrumento anal… Show more
“…We expect to find a factorial structure of EIAPsi similar to the one found in the Brazilian version, formed by 11 factors/ areas of Psychology (Ambiel & Martins, 2016, 2019; as well as positive correlations between personality traits Openness, Extroversion, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness and areas of interest measured by EIAPsi (Ambiel, Noronha, & Nunes, 2012;Bueno et al, 2004;Bullock & Reardon, 2008;Hurtado Rúa et al, 2019;Wille & De Fruyt, 2014); finally, the Neuroticism personality trait is expected to correlate negatively with the areas of interest measured by the EIAPsi (Bueno et al, 2004;Bullock & Reardon, 2008;Hurtado Rúa et al, 2019;Wille & De Fruyt, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Another scale, also in Portuguese, which assesses professional interests in the different activity areas and possibilities in Psychology, was developed in Brazil by Ambiel and Martins (2016), and called the Scale of Interests by Psychology Areas (EIAPsi). The authors had the participation of 392 Brazilian Psychology students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the requirements for the training of psychologists, whether in the Portuguese or international context, with specific skills and competences, ethical principles and contextualization with the socio-cultural aspect, a wide number of possibilities for the performance of this professional has been generated. It becomes useful to develop instruments that assess, with good psychometric characteristics, the interests in specific areas in Psychology, aiming to offer a complementary tool to assist the process of choice in the areas (Campos, Catão, & Fujii, 1999), an objective proposed by the EIAPsi (Ambiel & Martins, 2016, 2019.…”
Considering the need to understand the variables related to the choice for Psychology specialties, this study aimed to present the adaptation process and to verify validity evidence based on the internal structure for the Portuguese version of the Scale of Interests by Areas of Psychology (EIAPsi) and relate it to personality. The sample consisted of 340 Portuguese university students, using the EIAPsi and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Exploratory Factor Analysis and correlations between instruments were performed. There was a factorial structure formed by 10 factors for the EIAPsi with satisfactory precision indexes. The dimensions of openness and agreeableness were the most frequently correlated to the areas of Psychology. We have concluded that evidence of initial validity of the instrument were presented, indicating possibilities of its use in the Portuguese context, specifically in situations aimed at self-knowledge (classroom or clinic/office) and guiding students in choosing their area of expertise.
“…We expect to find a factorial structure of EIAPsi similar to the one found in the Brazilian version, formed by 11 factors/ areas of Psychology (Ambiel & Martins, 2016, 2019; as well as positive correlations between personality traits Openness, Extroversion, Conscientiousness and Agreeableness and areas of interest measured by EIAPsi (Ambiel, Noronha, & Nunes, 2012;Bueno et al, 2004;Bullock & Reardon, 2008;Hurtado Rúa et al, 2019;Wille & De Fruyt, 2014); finally, the Neuroticism personality trait is expected to correlate negatively with the areas of interest measured by the EIAPsi (Bueno et al, 2004;Bullock & Reardon, 2008;Hurtado Rúa et al, 2019;Wille & De Fruyt, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Another scale, also in Portuguese, which assesses professional interests in the different activity areas and possibilities in Psychology, was developed in Brazil by Ambiel and Martins (2016), and called the Scale of Interests by Psychology Areas (EIAPsi). The authors had the participation of 392 Brazilian Psychology students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the requirements for the training of psychologists, whether in the Portuguese or international context, with specific skills and competences, ethical principles and contextualization with the socio-cultural aspect, a wide number of possibilities for the performance of this professional has been generated. It becomes useful to develop instruments that assess, with good psychometric characteristics, the interests in specific areas in Psychology, aiming to offer a complementary tool to assist the process of choice in the areas (Campos, Catão, & Fujii, 1999), an objective proposed by the EIAPsi (Ambiel & Martins, 2016, 2019.…”
Considering the need to understand the variables related to the choice for Psychology specialties, this study aimed to present the adaptation process and to verify validity evidence based on the internal structure for the Portuguese version of the Scale of Interests by Areas of Psychology (EIAPsi) and relate it to personality. The sample consisted of 340 Portuguese university students, using the EIAPsi and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Exploratory Factor Analysis and correlations between instruments were performed. There was a factorial structure formed by 10 factors for the EIAPsi with satisfactory precision indexes. The dimensions of openness and agreeableness were the most frequently correlated to the areas of Psychology. We have concluded that evidence of initial validity of the instrument were presented, indicating possibilities of its use in the Portuguese context, specifically in situations aimed at self-knowledge (classroom or clinic/office) and guiding students in choosing their area of expertise.
“…A chave de resposta é dada em uma escala Likert de cinco pontos que varia de "1 -Detesto/detestaria exercer essa atividade" a "5 -Adoro/adoraria exercer essa atividade". A busca pelas propriedades psicométricas para a EIAPsi é o foco deste artigo, apesar de já haver algumas evidências iniciais, conforme citado anteriormente (Ambiel & Martins, 2016a;Ambiel & Martins, no prelo;Martins et al, 2014).…”
Section: Escala De Interesses Por áReas Da Psicologia -unclassified
“…A respeito da avaliação dos interesses, há relatos na literatura sobre medidas de interesses profissionais específicos para o contexto da Psicologia (Campos et al, 1999;Ferreira, Rodrigues, & Ferreira, 2015;Rabelo, Pilati, & Porto, 2016;Rodrigues, Ferreira, & Bártolo-Ribeiro, 2013 (Ferreira et al, 2015;Rodrigues et al, 2013). Campos et al (1999) constatadas evidências de validade baseadas no conteúdo (Martins, Hernández, & Ambiel, 2014) e na relação com outras variáveis (Ambiel & Martins, 2016a 24,2%); 3.º ano (n = 318; 32,4%); 4.º ano (n = 181; 18,5%); e 5.º ano (n = 168; 17,1%). Os participantes responderam à pesquisa de forma presencial (n = 388; 39,6%) e online (n = 592; 60,4%).…”
Os estudantes de Psicologia devem realizar escolhas profissionais durante o curso, podendo vivenciar um período angustiante. O objetivo deste artigo foi buscar evidências de validade e precisão para a Escala de Interesses por Áreas da Psicologia (EIAPsi) e verificar as diferenças do sexo e período do curso nas médias dos interesses. Participaram 980 estudantes de Psicologia que responderam a EIAPsi. Os resultados indicaram 11 fatores como melhor estrutura para EIAPsi, os quais apresentaram bons índices de precisão. Notou-se que as mulheres pontuaram mais que os homens nas áreas Saúde e Jurídica, sendo o oposto observado na área Docência e Pesquisa. Os estudantes do fim do curso apresentaram um perfil de interesses mais discriminado que os demais. A partir dos resultados foi possível identificar a viabilidade da utilização da EIAPsi por estudantes de Psicologia no contexto brasileiro.
Basic psychology training in Brazil has been the subject of research and criticism. This study investigated the perception of students about the domain of professional competences acquired during the undergraduate course. The research had a multilevel and longitudinal design with three successive collections, during 6 semesters, contemplating 213 students (84% women) from the State of Maranhão, from two institutions, one public (13%) and one private (87%). The questionnaire contained 21 skills for the psychology undergraduate course defined by the Curriculum Guidelines of the Ministry of Education. The analyses were conducted by a multilevel modeling for longitudinal data, specifically a multilevel model of repeated measures, with time being considered the first level of analysis and the individuals the second level. The results indicated a homogeneous evolution in the competences in the dimensions scientific research skills, individual psychological processes, and psychological group and organizational processes. Participation in college extension activities had significant effects on these three dimensions, while the professional internship did not influence any of them. The participation in scientific research initiation projects was a predictor exclusively of the domain of scientific research competences. The results suggest the need for reflection on undergraduate courses in psychology, with changes in the projects of scientific research initiation and internship.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.