2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interdiffusion in the Ni–Mo system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average interdiffusion coefficient of the Mo 7 Ni 7 phase extracted using Wagner's method agrees well with the results from both the SauereFreise method and the forwardsimulation method when the composition dependency of interdiffusivity for this phase is small. The interdiffusion coefficients in the fcc Ni phase reported by Divya et al [28] are also given in Fig. 7(c), showing about four times higher values than our results.…”
Section: Niemosupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The average interdiffusion coefficient of the Mo 7 Ni 7 phase extracted using Wagner's method agrees well with the results from both the SauereFreise method and the forwardsimulation method when the composition dependency of interdiffusivity for this phase is small. The interdiffusion coefficients in the fcc Ni phase reported by Divya et al [28] are also given in Fig. 7(c), showing about four times higher values than our results.…”
Section: Niemosupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In Ni-Mo and Co-Mo, very high hardness values of 11 and 16 GPa are obtained near the equiatomic composition. These compositions are identified as intermetallic phases from the discontinuity in the concentration-distance profiles (Figures S1(d) and (e)) as characterized in prior studies of Divya et al [10,21] We exclude these data points from our analysis as they do not represent solid-solutions. We also exclude data corresponding to Mo-rich end of the DCs as Mo shows limited solid solubility of less than 1 at.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the diffusion couple (DC) approach combined with smallscale testing methods such as nanoindentation and/or micropillar compression holds great promise. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] By means of the DC method, a library of compositions is generated in the interdiffusion zones, and the compositional analysis along these zones is performed with a high degree of accuracy by employing techniques such as electron probe microanalysis (EPMA). The interdiffusion zones are then probed for hardness, H, by employing nanoindentation (NI), and H as a function of solute concentration, c, is obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kirkendall pores result from imbalanced diffusional fluxes, with a net outward flux of Ni and Cr atoms leaving vacancies in the Ni-Cr matrix, which coalesce into pores. [36][37][38] After homogenization at 1373 K (1100°C) for 48 hours, as shown in Figure 2(b), the central part of the wire is pore-free indicating pore sintering, while the outer wire region is characterized by the Kirkendall pores merging into larger, elongated pores which are connected at the wire surface. Mo content, as measured by EDS, is 4.5 ± 0.7 wt pct and near uniform throughout the entire cross-section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%